Discon’s proposal to add council appointees rejected in 3-2 vote after concerns about politics, size
Vogeltanz amendment broadens scope to include budget cuts and efficiencies
MANDEVILLE — The Mandeville City Council voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution No. 25-39 at its August 14th meeting, creating an Income Strategies Committee to explore new revenue sources and cost-saving measures while advising the council through monthly reports from the mayor.
The council spent much of its discussion debating a proposal by Councilman at Large Scott Discon to restructure the committee’s membership. Discon argued that each council member should appoint a citizen representative, with the mayor also allowed one appointee, saying it would ensure balance and prevent the group from being stacked with one point of view.
“I think this committee needs to be balanced,” Discon said. “It needs to have people with different views. It needs to be well-rounded.”
District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz initially voiced some support, noting that “the more brain power and expertise that we can put on the committee, we can’t possibly be hurt by that.” But he also cautioned against losing the existing language that let the mayor appoint individuals with particular skills, suggesting the amendment was better suited as an addition rather than a replacement.
District III Councilwoman Jill Lane strongly opposed the idea, warning that expanding the committee could make it unmanageable. “Anytime you get a big group with big ideas … we need real answers,” she said. Lane worried that too many “armchair accountants” could muddy the process, turning the group into “some political hotbed” rather than a source of solutions.
Discon’s amendment would have expanded the committee’s makeup from four-person study group to 10, or possibly more, with other discussion around voting.
Mayor Clay Madden reminded the council that the panel was designed as a study committee or work group, not a decision-making body. “The committee’s not set up to vote,” he said. “It’s a study committee by intention.”
The mayor came up with the idea for the committee, and will appoint the district and at-large council members. The committee, once formed, can add citizens they deem could be helpful.
Discon’s amendment ultimately failed 3-2, with only Discon and Vogeltanz voting in favor. Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman and District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson joined Lane in opposition.
Later in the meeting, Vogeltanz offered a separate amendment that broadened the committee’s mission beyond identifying new income streams. His change directs the group to also evaluate budget reductions and efficiencies, ensuring that cost-cutting ideas are considered alongside revenue options. The amendment passed unanimously.
As adopted, the committee will include the mayor (as chair), the finance director, one district council member, one at-large council member, and other members as deemed necessary. It will operate for six months unless extended and must follow Louisiana’s Open Meetings Law.
‘Secret meeting’ objective to rally public outrage at police, worker compensation
Finance director: budget is balanced, fiscally restrained
Officials: resources exceed spending
2024 political foes resuscitate rejected budget narrative
Updated 8/17/2025: Expands reporting on citizen meeting and positions.
MANDEVILLE — The City Council on Thursday adopted Mandeville’s fiscal 2026 operating and capital budgets, codified in Ordinances 25-25 and 25-26, after more than two hours of debate and a series of failed amendments aimed at reducing spending.
The operating budget (Ordinance 25-25) passed 4-1, with Councilman at Large Scott Discon casting the lone “no” vote. District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson, District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz, District III Councilwoman Jill Lane, and Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman voted in favor.
Vogeltanz offered three amendments — to defund a city clerk position primarily handling public records requests, to cancel a planned Comprehensive Land Use Regulation Ordinance rewrite, and to reduce employee cost-of-living adjustments from 2.5% to 1% — but each failed by narrow margins.
Discon attempted to postpone the vote because he wanted the administration to propose cuts instead of the council being tied to voting on specific cuts. His motion died for lack of a second.
The capital budget (Ordinance 25-26) passed unanimously, 5-0. Vogeltanz proposed three amendments: to remove funding for three Mandeville Police Department vehicles, to eliminate replacement windows at the historic former town hall, and to cancel America Street Park’s environmental remediation and improvements. All failed, including one — the police vehicle cut — that was voted down unanimously.
Summary of voting on the FY2026 City of Mandeville budget. (Mandeville Daily)
The adoptions cap a budget process marked by agreement on the city’s overall fiscal strength but continued disagreement over whether to make immediate cuts or focus on long-term fixes such as sales tax rededication.
Runyon renews 2024 budget crisis push ahead of FY2026 vote
According to sources, Glen Runyon — the former efficiency consultant for the City of Mandeville and now a frequent critic of Mayor Clay Madden — hosted a meeting in the Sanctuary neighborhood on Sunday, August 10th.
A text was sent out reading in part: “Glen Runyon, a bipartisan business/government consultant, is hosting a one hour informational meeting to factually explain the current city’s financial situation, how we got here, and options for a sustainable, long-term path forward.”
“The Mayor and council now are talking about reaching into voter decided “dedicated funds” for important infrastructure, such as streets, drainage, and flood protection. The city wants to ‘un dedicate’ these restricted infrastructure funds to transfer additional money to the general fund to offset existing and future deficits,” the invitation continued.
Attendance at the first four budget hearings this time around was sparse, but the final session — held the day after the Sanctuary meeting and following Vogeltanz’s public hint at a possible COLA cut amendment — drew a near-capacity crowd.
According to sources, the Sanctuary meeting spurred the surge in attendance at the last two meetings. One attendee said the goal was to stage a visible challenge at the council meetings and “demand” answers about what organizers described as “outrageous” pay and benefits for police and city employees.
At Thursday’s meeting, Runyon took the podium repeatedly to challenge the administration’s characterization of the FY2026 budget as fiscally sound as well as criticisms of employee benefits.
A small group of Runyon’s allies echoed his concerns, each offering comments at multiple points before votes on Vogeltanz’s amendments, never fully supporting nor opposing any of them.
Runyon peppered council members and Finance Director Jessica Farno with questions and data points, echoing information he is known to email to the full council throughout the budget process, and again today, the day after the budget was approved.
On social media in recent weeks, Runyon had promoted:
completely eliminating the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for police and non-police,
forcing employees to pay a larger share of their health insurance cost, and
steadily reducing the city’s contribution to the employee retirement fund while the employee would start to pay more and more.
If enacted, these would result in across-the-board pay cuts for all city employees, the likes of which Mandeville has never seen, according to publicly available information.
Social media post on Nextdoor.com website. (Nextdoor)
During Thursday’s meeting, Lane challenged the veracity of the information reportedly disseminated by Runyon Sunday, calling it misinformation.
Police show up in force
At the final two budget hearings, Vogeltanz presented a range of potential cuts that he later formed into amendments he offered Thursday night — as he claimed — to offer budget critics options if they were serious about cutting spending to fit within only recurring tax revenue.
One of these suggestions was to just lower the COLA from 2.5 percent to 1 percent only for FY2026. At the time, Vogeltanz told the audience that he didn’t necessarily plan to vote for any of his would-be amendments, but that he was responding to the budget critics who requested cuts.
The combined employee compensation talk from both Runyon and Vogeltanz drew a substantial turnout of police and city workers to the August 11th and 14th meetings, several of whom spoke against the amendment, including Municipal Police Employees’ Civil Service Board Chairman Brian Burke.
This put the Runyon boosters in a precarious position, as the significant turnout by police and city workers seemed to have a damping effect on planned criticisms of pay and benefits, which sources say was the reason for their presence in the first place.
Mayor sounds off
Mayor Clay Madden made his feelings known just before adjournment, recognizing and thanking the council for their work throughout the budget process.
He described the FY2026 budget hearings as the best he’s ever participated in.
“But I do have a problem with a group of people having a secret Sunday meeting (Sanctuary meeting), that none of us were invited to, at the last minute, after we had very productive budget meetings, trying to sabotage it at the end. Why not come to the meetings (budget hearings) that we had if you had some concerns?” Madden said.
He derided the budget crisis narrative, saying, “If it was true, none of us would have been elected.”
Summary of FY2026 Mandeville budget
The FY2026 operating and capital budgets total $28.8 million in general fund expenditures, including capital outlay. Farno says the budget reduces total general fund spending by more than 27 percent compared to the prior year’s revised budget, maintains more than six months’ worth of reserves — triple the Government Finance Officers Association’s recommended minimum — and ends FY2025 with a projected $14.8 million general fund balance.
The budget is balanced in the sense that total resources exceed planned spending, but recurring general fund revenue is about $1.2 million less than recurring expenditures. That gap will be covered with existing fund balances, a practice some council members criticized. The budget relies heavily on dedicated sales tax revenue, much of which is restricted to specific uses like streets, drainage, and District 3 improvements. This has left the general fund — which pays for police, public works, parks, and administration — under greater long-term pressure.
Major provisions in the budget include funding for police vehicle replacements, building maintenance such as new windows at the detective station, and other capital projects across the city. America Street Park remains funded from prior-year appropriations and a state matching grant, with no new FY2026 dollars allocated. Employee salaries and benefits reflect existing cost-of-living adjustments and merit opportunities.
Madden and Farno describe the budget as fiscally sound, prioritizing needed maintenance and community improvements while preserving healthy reserves.
Budget by the numbers – FY2026 budget
$28.8 million — Total general fund expenditures, including capital outlay
$14.8 million — Projected FY2025 year-end general fund balance
$1.8 million — Gap between recurring general fund revenue and recurring expenditures
27% — Reduction in total general fund spending compared to FY2025 revised budget (including capital outlay)
0 — New FY2026 funding for America Street Park (all from prior-year appropriations)
$60+ million — Estimated total cash and investments across all city funds at start of FY2026 (includes restricted funds)
Restricted vs. Unrestricted Funds – FY2026 context
Unrestricted (General Fund)
Pays for: Police, public works, administration, parks, day-to-day operations
FY2025 projected year-end balance: $14.8 million
Share of total city funds: Minority (most city cash is restricted)
Source of strain: Budgeted recurring expenditures exceed budgeted recurring revenue by $1.2 million
Restricted Funds
Examples: Street Fund, Drainage Fund, District 3 Fund, Sales Tax Fund, Capital Projects Fund
Pays for: Specific uses only, as set by voter-approved dedications or grants
FY2025 projected combined balances: Tens of millions (cannot be used for general operations without voter approval)
Main issue: Balances keep growing because revenue exceeds spending capacity in these categories
Why it matters
While the city appears “cash-rich” with over $60 million in total cash and investments, much of that money is locked into restricted purposes and cannot legally be redirected to the general fund without a voter-approved sales tax rededication.
Members debate whether to cut spending or wait as budget imbalance stems from restricted funds
Some council members weigh targeted cuts against the risk of deferring action on structural fix
MANDEVILLE — The Mandeville City Council will decide Thursday whether to adopt the city’s fiscal 2026 operating and capital budgets, codified in Ordinances 25-25 and 25-26, following weeks of hearings that revealed clear philosophical differences but little movement in positions.
The consensus: the $28.8 million general fund budget is balanced, and the city remains in a strong financial position with reserves far exceeding recommended levels.
(Editor’s note: See “Budget hearings recap” later in this story.)
The dispute: whether to make cuts this year to reduce the projected $1.8 million gap between recurring revenue and general fund expenditures, or to pass the mayor’s proposal largely intact and focus on long-term fixes such as sales tax reallocation.
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman continues to push for a voter-approved shift in sales tax allocations paired with a rate cut, warning against overtaxing residents and deferring maintenance.
District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz has proposed $1.93 million in cuts to fully offset the shortfall this year, framing them as a starting point for debate.
Councilman at Large Scott Discon also favors trimming the budget but wants the administration, not the council, to identify the reductions.
District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson and District III Councilwoman Jill Lane oppose hasty cuts, stressing the need to avoid decisions that could increase costs later and expressing openness to a reallocation vote after public input.
Mayor Clay Madden stands by his budget, saying it funds the community improvements residents expect and rejects the “sky is falling” warnings that have surfaced in past budget cycles.
Finance Director Jessica Farno has defended the proposal as fiscally restrained and warned against what she called “short-sighted” last-minute reductions.
Thursday’s vote will cap a budget process that council members on all sides have called one of the most substantive in recent years. But it is unlikely to end the broader debate over how to resolve the city’s structural funding imbalance — an issue that could define next year’s budget talks.
Budget hearings recap: Each official’s stance and extended remarks
At its August 5th and 11th budget hearings, the final two in the series of five, council members sparred over whether to reduce general fund spending now — potentially delaying police purchases and capital improvements — or wait for a possible reallocation of sales taxes next year that could rebalance the city’s finances without cutting services.
No reallocation vote has been scheduled yet, but Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, the council chairman, has led calls for pursuing one.
Hear is a breakdown of each official’s remarks from the various budget hearings:
Jason Zuckerman: Tax relief through reallocation, warns against hoarding funds
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman reiterated that Mandeville’s FY26 budget is balanced and in the black, rejecting what he called “misinformation” about a deficit.
While acknowledging the problem of recurring general fund revenue falling short of general fund expenditures, he said that issue does not amount to a fiscal emergency and must be solved through a reallocation of sales tax revenue while simultaneously cutting taxes.
Zuckerman argued that deep cuts to capital and operating expenses this year would only add to the city’s already large excess fund balance, meaning “we have charged the taxpayers money and not spent it yet again.”
He said the city is “overtaxing our citizens year after year” and advocated for a voter-approved reallocation of sales taxes coupled with tax relief.
Without a unified council to promote it, he warned, the plan has no chance of passing. Zuckerman also cautioned against deferring maintenance and capital needs simply to set aside more money, calling that “sticking it in a mattress” and “kicking the can down the road.” While stressing the need to bring projected expenditure growth in line with slower revenue growth, he opposed making last-minute cuts this year that he said would hurt services without solving the long-term problem.
“We need to focus on fixing that [fund structure] rather than cutting services, which the people have already paid for.” Zuckerman said. “I’m not for defunding projects. I’m really not for cutting funding to the police department at this time.”
He reiterated his proposal to pursue a March 2026 reallocation of sales taxes to shift revenue into the general fund, calling it a long-term solution. Zuckerman added that the general fund balance — while down from its 2019 peak—is still well above the level auditors have said is healthy, and there is no immediate financial crisis.
Scott Discon: Supportive of reallocation, but remains skeptical
Councilman at Large Scott Discon maintained his position that the FY26 proposal is a deficit budget, citing a $1.74 million gap between revenues and expenses. While supportive of finding ways to cut back, he argued it should be the administration — not the council — that identifies specific reductions. Discon said department heads and the finance office are best positioned to develop the strategies needed to close the gap, as they have in past years.
He reiterated concerns over growing employee benefit costs and pointed to two large capital items he believes deserve scrutiny: the $3.31 million America Street Park project, which lies outside city limits, and $250,000 in city hall expenditures when the promised new police station remains unfinished. Calling the police facility the city’s “number one priority,” he said funds should first be secured to move officers into a safe, mold-free building.
Discon stressed that his aim was not to single out individuals but to raise questions about whether certain appropriations are appropriate given the city’s financial position.
“But I don’t see why as a councilman, I have to be the one to pick and choose and debate with my fellow councilmen up here, what has to be cut.”
He continued, “The other option is for us to sit up here tonight and then we would have to make offers of what we feel should be cut. And I don’t know if that’s really fair for us or fair for you.”
Discon said he supports Zuckerman’s reallocation idea but expressed doubt as to whether it would be approved by voters.
“Just like the parish, there are some people that are not gonna support it,” Discon said. “I’m just concerned … that just fixing the rededication is not gonna solve our problem.”
He questioned why projects he proposed for the city’s central neighborhoods continue to be delayed while funding remains committed to projects like America Street Park, which lies outside the city limits.
Kevin Vogeltanz: Offered cuts to nullify ‘shortfall’
District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz acknowledged the structural issue but presented possible cuts to the budget to neutralize what political foes of Mayor Clay Madden say is a shortfall in the general fund.
“We are told by our auditors that we are the only municipality in Louisiana … that has zero debt. We owe no money to anybody. We are masters of our own fate today. We have approximately … $60 million in cash and investments, $60 million,” Vogeltanz told the crowded Council Chambers.
“This is not a deficit budget. At the end of the budget year, we will have more money than we had at the beginning of the year.”
He continued, “It’s not deficit budget, but it’s a general fund shortfall.” However, “out of a sense of conservative fiscal outlook,” he was offering a series of proposed cuts to give the council and the public an option, should they chosoe it.
Vogeltanz presented a slate of proposed cuts totaling $1.932 million — enough to more than offset the projected “shortfall” and leave a small surplus.
The list includes reductions or deferrals in vehicle purchases, building maintenance, and other line items. Vogeltanz said the council and public should be prepared for the reality that “cutting the budget means cutting things that people want.” He emphasized that the discussion should inform both the current budget debate and future talks on sales tax reallocation.
Proposed cuts to the FY26 budget that District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz says he plans to offer as amendments at the August 14th meeting. (Keven Vogeltanz)
Cynthia Strong-Thompson: Defends council’s diligence, highlights outside praise for Mandeville
District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson used part of her comments to counter suggestions that council members are acting with political motives or lack financial understanding.
She noted that all members recently traveled to Lake Charles for the Louisiana Municipal Association conference, taking time away from jobs and families to learn best practices from other cities. While there, she met Clay Stafford of Reliant Investment Management, who later sent her a handwritten letter praising Mandeville as a city “others seek to emulate” and noting that other municipalities have mirrored some of its ordinances.
Strong-Thompson said the encounter underscored that Mandeville is viewed positively beyond its borders and that the council is actively seeking ways to improve, including exploring potential cost-sharing arrangements for large projects such as the America Street Park. She stressed that the trip and her engagement with peers and experts reflected a commitment to informed decision-making, not political maneuvering.
Strong‑Thompson supports adopting a balanced FY26 budget that protects essential services and neighborhood‑level needs. She is cautious about any near‑term tax cut or revenue shift that could constrain operations, emphasizing the importance of maintenance, public safety and equitable service delivery across districts. She favors a deliberate review of options before pursuing structural changes.
She said she could not support removing the window replacement project for the police investigations building, which she noted is currently covered with cardboard and duct tape.
“If we don’t take care of our properties, then we have larger costs down the road,” she said, noting that even cuts of $150,000 “aren’t fixing the problem” caused by an overly restricted fund structure.
Strong-Thompson aligned with Zuckerman’s diagnosis of the broader issue, calling the city’s budgeting restrictions “a crumble over here” that makes small line-item cuts feel like empty gestures.
Jill Lane: In favor of planning, not panic
District III Councilwoman Jill Lane recounted the city’s recent efforts to improve employee pay and morale, noting that an efficiency study in 2020 revealed low wages, staffing shortages, and low morale, particularly in public works and the police department.
Subsequent salary adjustments and cost-of-living increases, she said, were necessary to attract and retain qualified staff. Lane credited these steps with improving service and employee satisfaction.
She stressed that while the city must prepare for future fiscal challenges, this year’s budget is not projected to run a deficit and will likely end with about $14 million in reserves.
Lane warned that cutting major purchases such as police cars or city hall window replacements could lead to higher maintenance costs later and that delaying capital projects often results in higher prices. She also clarified that the America Street Park funding is a prior-year appropriation, not part of the FY26 budget, and therefore cannot be cut from it.
Lane said she is open to a public vote on rededicating sales tax revenue but wants decisions to be informed by detailed pros-and-cons analyses. She cautioned against hasty budget cuts that could cost the city more in the long run.
Clay Madden: Defends community investments, rejects “sky is falling” rhetoric
Mayor Clay Madden praised the FY26 budget process as the most productive since he took office in 2020, citing constructive, big-picture discussions about the city’s future.
Responding to a resident’s question about the Harbor Pavilion project, Madden said years of deferred maintenance had left city assets in need of upgrades, and he believes residents expect their leaders to invest in parks and other public amenities.
While not opposed to specific project cuts if the council chooses, he said his philosophy is to “take less money from the people and use it for what people actually want,” rather than stockpiling cash in savings.
Madden contrasted his approach with past leadership, which he said often left projects unfinished. He emphasized that all improvement projects have been vetted through the council’s annual budget process and argued that warnings of financial crisis are nothing new and have not come to pass in decades.
“The sky has never fallen because we do this every year,” he said, adding that he looks forward to finalizing and passing a “good budget” in the coming meetings.
Finance director urges council to reject ‘short-sighted’ last-minute cuts
Finance Director Jessica Farno, a certified public accountant licensed in Louisiana, told the Mandeville City Council she has a fiduciary duty to safeguard the city’s financial health and will not “rubber-stamp or play politics.”
She said the administration has already reduced general fund spending by more than 27 percent compared to the previous year, proof of fiscal restraint.
“The city maintains over six months of reserve coverage. That’s more than triple the GFOA’s (Government Finance Officers Association) recommended minimum of two months, and more than adequate given the city’s risk environment, revenue stability, and operational needs,” she said.
Farno warned against last-minute budget amendments aimed at one-time expenditures, calling them an “illusion” of fiscal toughness that would defer needed maintenance, public safety, and capital projects — increasing costs over time.
“There is no fiscal emergency,” Farno said, citing a projected $14.8 million general fund balance for FY25, six months of reserve coverage, and even healthier restricted funds. She noted the mayor is forming an ad hoc committee to review fiscal policies, address structural cost drivers, and plan for the next five years.
Those challenges, she said, cannot be solved with rushed political moves but require strategic, forward-looking planning. “We cannot govern effectively if every budget becomes a line-by-line political litmus test,” she added.
Says city collects $3.4M more per year than it spends
Excess money can’t be touched while general fund dwindles
2026 proposed budget 3% less than previous
City on track to be $2M under budget on operating expenses for 2025
MANDEVILLE — Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman is proposing a sales tax reduction for Mandeville residents, arguing the city is collecting millions more than it spends and should return some of that money to taxpayers while still maintaining essential services.
At a budget hearing on July 23rd — the latest in a series before adoption of the city’s fiscal year 2025-2026 budget — Zuckerman laid out a plan to reduce the overall sales tax burden while shifting how the remaining tax revenue is divided among city funds. The goal, he says, is to stop overfilling restricted accounts while the general fund, which pays for most day-to-day operations, continues to shrink.
“The city is already collecting $3.4 million per year more than it spends,” Zuckerman said. “We can lower the tax rate and still fund core services — if we fix how that money is allocated.”
Zuckerman’s remarks came in stark contrast to Councilman at Large Scott Discon’s suggestion that the city shouldn’t rely on a ballot measure to reallocate sales taxes in favor of cutting spending and services and holding the millage rates steady.
Discon expressed concern that a city-wide ballot initiative would fail after a much larger, parish-wide rededication narrowly failed in the spring, leaving parish officials scrambling to make adjustments.
“And if, according to Mr. Zuckerman, he wants to give them a percentage cut on the sales tax, that’s fine. But I don’t think you can put it all on the residents right now. They don’t think the parish is spending all the money properly or wisely.”
Uneven growth among city funds
Mandeville’s budget is divided into a “general fund,” which pays for most recurring expenses and non-infrastructure capital projects; five restricted funds, which are limited primarily to streets and drainage; and an Enterprise Fund for water and sewer operations. By ordinance — and with voter approval — sales tax revenues are distributed among these funds according to fixed percentages, and cannot be changed without voter approval.
Zuckerman cited figures showing that since 2018:
The general fund balance has dropped by $7 million (from $21 million to $14 million).
The combined balances of all city funds grew by $18 million (from $49 million to $67 million).
Most notably, the restricted funds grew by $23.4 million, or roughly $3.4 million per year.
“This isn’t an income problem,” Zuckerman said. “It’s an accounting restriction problem. We’re taxing citizens, then tying up their money in funds we legally can’t use for basic operations.”
Property taxes compared to sales taxes
Discon stressed the importance of holding Mandeville’s property tax millages steady, which the council voted unanimously at its last meeting to do.
“It would seem to me that if we showed the public: one, we’re not going to raise the millage — we’re going to hold off; and two, we make some cuts. Let’s just make some cuts and show them that we’re being responsible. The council’s job here is to authorize the spending, and it just appears that maybe we’re spending too much money,” he said.
But city property taxes only account for about 7.5 percent of a Mandeville homeowner’s property tax bill, with the rest going to the parish.
And according to the city’s fiscal year 2024 financial report, property taxes only account for 5.9 percent of total revenue. The city of Mandeville collected $21.6 million in sales tax revenue, accounting for a whopping 59 percent of its total income, but only $2.1 million from property taxes, or 5.9 percent. The city’s overall revenue for the year was $36.5 million, with the remaining funds coming from franchise fees, licenses, permits, intergovernmental transfers, fines and other sources.
FY2024 Revenue by source and destination fund. (Mandeville Daily)
The median home value in the City of Mandeville is approximately $385,000, significantly higher than St. Tammany Parish’s median of about $285,000, or excluding Mandeville, estimated between $250,000 and $270,000, according to the most recent available data from the U.S. Census Bureau and Realtor.com. (This will likely not reflect the 2024 increased property assessments.)
This means that in 2024, the typical Mandeville property owner paid just over $300 to the city in property taxes while sending nearly $4,000 to the parish.
Council members and property taxes
District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson pointed out at the July 24th council meeting that the median home value in her district was significantly higher than the rest of the city.
Strong-Thompson’s Sanctuary home was assessed by the parish at $787,483 total fair market value for 2024, higher than the city and parish’s median values combined, according to the St. Tammany Parish Assessor’s Office website. Her tax bill to the parish was $8,758.52 and $646.52 to the city. Her city taxes went up by $68.22 in 2024.
In Louisiana, an assessment ratio of 10 percent is applied to what the parish assessor determines to be the fair market value of a property, from which the homestead exemption — if applicable — is deducted, leaving the “taxable value.” For simplicity, we refer to the “assessment” as the assessed total fair market value. The resulting taxes mentioned herein for each property can be found at the St. Tammany Parish Assessor’s website.
Discon, on the other hand, whose home is about a block off Lakeshore Drive and was featured in a 2021 Times-Picayune article, came in at the bottom of the pack of council members being assessed at only $265,374, much lower than the Mandeville median value and right at the parish median. He only had to pay $2,340.22 to the parish and $217.87 to the city. His city taxes increased by $32.08 in 2024.
Zuckerman, who lives on the eastern end of Villere Street about seven-blocks distance from Lakeshore Drive, brought his last two property tax bills to the budget hearings to illustrate his argument about property taxes versus sales taxes. He was in the middle of the council pack at an assessment of $413,442, meaning he paid the parish $4,160.47 and the city, $339.43. Zuckerman’s city taxes saw the largest jump among council members at $77.28 due to his home seeing the largest assessment increase.
Council members’ assessments and tax bills for 2024 vs. 2023. (St. Tammany Parish Assessor’s Office website)
The city property tax cut championed by Discon last year, which cut the total city millage from 8.86 to 8.21, only provided a paltry savings of $25.08 annually for the typical Mandeville homeowner, barely $2 a month. The stated objective of the cut was to keep the city revenue neutral on ad valorem taxes in anticipation of inflationary assessments by the parish.
Despite Discon’s 2024 social media claim that “City property taxes will not go up at all this year,” most Mandeville homeowners still ended up paying more in city property taxes due to the parish assessments. While the City of Mandeville did cut its ad valorem tax rate, the sharp rise in assessed values led to higher tax bills despite the cut. The city’s year-to-date ad valorem collections confirm this, as the city is on track to collect nearly 3 percent more for fiscal year 2025 than in 2024.
Post from Councilman at Large Scott Discon’s Facebook page from Sept. 24, 2024. (Facebook)
But even if Mandeville were to completely abolish city property taxes, the typical property owner would barely save $25 per month while still sending over $300 a month to the parish, not to mention, the city’s restricted funds issue would still need to be addressed, according to Zuckerman.
No to cuts, yes to rebalancing
Zuckerman’s proposal would cut the sales tax rate to reflect the city’s recurring surpluses, while also pursuing a reallocation or redefinition to direct a greater share of revenue to the general fund expenses and less to the restricted accounts that have seen outsized growth. He said all this can easily be done while cutting the sales tax by at least $1 million.
He also pushed back against what he described as budget-cutting for appearances’ sake, taking aim at Discon’s remarks, who suggested good-faith budget cutting without addressing revenue distribution.
“We’re taking money from the taxpayers and we’re sticking it in the mattress — and it’s not right,” Zuckerman said. “I’m not in favor of just cutting for the sake of cutting, just to say we cut something. I’m not in favor of cutting or reducing services just to say we did.”
Councilmen at Large Jason Zuckerman and Scott Discon expressed contrasting views on handling the city’s budget moving forward. (Mandeville Daily)
He emphasized that the city is not in a crisis — at least not financially — and warned against reducing services or benefits before correcting what he sees as a structural flaw in how tax revenue is managed.
“Before we raise property taxes, before we cut departments, before we reduce police or employee benefits — we need to fix how we’re using the money we already have,” he said.
Budget outlook stable
Zuckerman noted that the administration’s proposed operating budget for fiscal year 2025–2026 is 3 percent lower than last year’s adopted budget. Additionally, the city is currently on track to finish the current fiscal year $2 million under budget on operating expenses.
Despite those positive indicators, Zuckerman expressed frustration that the council has been unwilling to even consider adjusting how sales tax revenue is allocated into restricted vs. non-restricted accounts, while continuing to over-tax the citizens.
No formal ordinance has been introduced yet, but Zuckerman indicated he will continue to advocate for structural reforms — with the goal of cutting taxes without cutting services.
Council to vote on property tax millage, surplus firearms disposal; budget ordinances introduced for future action
MANDEVILLE — Property tax rates, budget preparations, and surplus firearms disposal headline Thursday’s Mandeville City Council meeting, with several key ordinances up for adoption and others introduced for future consideration.
The most consequential vote of the night is the expected adoption of Ordinance 25-13, which would formally set the adjusted property tax millage rates for 2025. These rates help fund general operations and the Mandeville Police Department. The measure aligns with constitutional and state mandates and follows public hearings on the tax structure.
The measure was re-advertised to comply with state law and placed on the July 10th agenda.
Also on the agenda is Ordinance 25-23, which proposes declaring several city-owned firearms as surplus. If passed, the ordinance would allow the mayor to donate, exchange, or dispose of the items and sign all related documentation. The firearms are no longer deemed necessary for municipal use.
In new business, council members will consider Resolution 25-37, which would authorize the mayor to enter a professional services agreement with Neel-Schaffer, Inc. for a feasibility study on the proposed Mandeville Living Shoreline — a project aimed at bolstering coastal resilience. Another item, Resolution 25-38, would secure janitorial services from Natural Disinfection Solutions, LLC.
Several ordinances will be introduced but not voted on until a future meeting, including:
Ordinance 25-24, which would amend a state lease to expand the city’s water bottom lease area;
Ordinance 25-25, the city’s operating budget for fiscal year 2025–26;
Ordinance 25-26, the corresponding capital improvements budget.
These items are expected to receive detailed discussion and public input before being brought to a vote in August.
The agenda also includes a number of standard items grouped under the consent agenda, such as liquor license approvals, event permits for fall festivals, and a resolution amending a contract with Desire Line, LLC. These will be approved in globo unless pulled for separate discussion.
The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. at Mandeville City Hall.
Rates to automatically adjust with CPI moving forward
Rates last adjusted in 2019
Also: Controversial tree ordinance postponed again
MANDEVILLE — Mandeville residents have been paying nearly $5 less per month than the city is charged for garbage collection, creating an annual shortfall of approximately $255,000 that’s being covered by taxpayers. In response, the City Council passed an ordinance at Thursday’s City Council meeting (July 10th) to align monthly garbage fees with the actual rates billed under the city’s waste contract with Coastal Waste Services.
The city is currently paying Coastal $21.28 per garbage can each month but has been charging residents only $16.46 per can — a rate that has not been updated since 2019.
With approximately 4,211 cans billed to households and businesses, this $4.82 monthly gap per can amounts to over a $20,000 shortfall each month, or almost $250,000 annually.
That difference is being subsidized by city taxpayers, placing a growing strain on the city’s budget.
Ordinance No. 25-21 addresses this imbalance by amending Section 9-31 of the City Code to ensure garbage service fees charged to residents and businesses match the actual costs incurred under the city’s waste contract.
Going forward, rates will be determined through a legal bid process and memorialized in a signed agreement. The ordinance also provides for automatic annual rate adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Services, while allowing the City Council to approve additional changes in response to unforeseen operational cost increases.
Meeting Results:
Minutes:
1. Adoption of the June 26, 2025, council meeting minutes
Adopted, 5-0
Consent Agenda:
1. Adoption of Resolution 25-36: A resolution accepting the bid for the 2025 road and drainage maintenance contract and authorizing the mayor to execute a contract with the apparent low bidder, Creek Construction, LLC, and providing for other matters in connection therewith. (Councilman Discon, At-Large)
Adopted, 5-0.
Unfinished Business:
1. Adoption of Resolution 25-31: A resolution authorizing the mayor to sign a cooperative agreement between the City of Mandeville and St. Tammany Parish to undertake eligible community development and housing assistance activities within the City of Mandeville jurisdiction; to be pre-approved by the City of Mandeville and parish before activity takes place and providing for other matters in connection therewith. (Councilman Discon, At-Large)
Adopted, 5-0.
2. Adoption of Ordinance 25-11: An ordinance repealing and replacing Article 9, Section 9.2.5.7, Live Oak protection requirements, and amending Sections 9.2.3 and 9.2.5.14 of the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations Ordinance, and amending Division 19 of Appendix C Section 9.2.5.16 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Mandeville, and providing for other matters in connection therewith. (Councilman Discon, At-Large)
Postponed to August 14th, 5-0
New Business:
1. Establishing dates for 2026 budget hearings – 7/15/25, 7/21/25, 7/23/25, 8/5/25, and 8/11/25 to be discussed, confirmed, revised and/or added to.
Set as proposed, for 6 p.m. each date.
2. Adoption of Ordinance 25-21: An ordinance amending Section 9-31 of the City of Mandeville Code of Ordinances and Appendix C Division 9 Section 9-31 regarding monthly garbage service charges and providing for other matters in connection therewith. (Councilman Discon, At-Large)
Adopted, 5-0
3. Adoption of Ordinance 25-22: An ordinance declaring certain items as surplus and no longer needed for city use; authorizing the mayor to exchange, donate, or dispose of surplus items; authorizing the mayor to execute all necessary documents and providing for other matters in connection therewith. (Councilman Discon, At-Large)
Would add Bald Cypress and Magnolia trees to protected list, tighten construction rules
Zuckerman balked at Discon proposal at previous meeting
MANDEVILLE — A proposed ordinance authored by Councilman at Large Scott Discon would significantly broaden tree preservation efforts across the city by expanding protections beyond live oak trees and establishing new construction-related safeguards for maintaining tree health.
Originally scheduled for a vote on June 26th, the ordinance was postponed due to concerns raised by Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman. He expressed worries that the measure could impose a significant burden on property owners, potentially hindering their ability to develop their land. These objections necessitated the postponement and further consideration of the proposal before the rescheduled vote at the City Council’s July 10th regular meeting.
Zuckerman also posted his thoughts on Facebook, inviting feedback from the voters: “I am concerned that these changes may place a severe burden on property owners citywide and at the same time significantly increase Planning & Zoning agendas with variance requests.”
Ordinance 25-11 would revise the city’s Comprehensive Land Use Regulation Ordinance (CLURO) by redefining and replacing key terms in the landscaping and tree protection sections. Most notably, the ordinance expands the list of “protected trees” to include Bald Cypress and Southern Magnolia trees, along with all species of live oaks measuring five inches or more in diameter at breast height (“dbh”). Currently, only live oaks six inches or larger are specifically protected.
The measure would eliminate the existing “Live Oak Protection Requirements” section and replace it with a more comprehensive “Tree Preservation Requirements” provision. Among its new rules, landowners would be required to install four-foot-high, 12-gauge metal fencing around the drip line of each protected tree during construction. If a protected tree dies during development, the property owner must replace it with two trees of the same species. Administrative removal would only be allowed if both a licensed arborist and the city arborist determine the tree is dead; otherwise, a formal variance must be obtained.
The ordinance emphasizes the role of tree canopy in managing stormwater runoff — an issue of particular concern in Mandeville’s low-lying topography — and highlights the aesthetic and environmental benefits of maintaining mature trees.
Mandeville Daily consulted the current text of the CLURO in order to provide a less ambiguous interpretation of 25-11 for our readers:
Amend Article 9, Section 9.2.3 as follows:
Strike:
“6. Interior Landscape Area. Any landscaped area within the interior of a development site and beyond the required periphery landscape area that is planted with trees, shrubs and ground covering material to provide for infiltration of runoff, shade of parking areas or aesthetic enhancement of the site.”
Add:
“6. Landowner. The owner of that real property upon which a protected tree is located.”
Strike:
“12. Tree Canopy. The area within the circumference of the dripline of a tree. For purposes of these regulations, the average canopy of a mature Class A tree, except for live oaks and pines, shall be 700 square feet and the average canopy of a mature Class B tree shall be 125 square feet, the average canopy of a live oak shall be calculated as 1,500 square feet and the average canopy of a pine shall be 200 square feet.”
Add:
“12. Protected Tree. Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum), Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), and all species of live oaks possessing a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 5” or more.”
Amend Article 9, Section 9.2.5.7 as follows:
Strike title:
“Live Oak Protection Requirements.”
Add title:
“Tree Preservation Requirements.”
Strike all original text.
Add:
The City of Mandeville recognizes that in aesthetic benefits of a full tree canopy to the community, the proliferation of trees performs a valuable water management resource to the entire community by significantly augmenting the handling of water in low lying areas such as Mandeville. The removal of trees denigrates Mandeville’s ability to manage water resulting in aggravation of a sensitive water handling issue.
1. The landowner shall use reasonable care in maintaining protected trees. If a protected tree dies during construction of any improvements the landowner shall replace the protected tree with two (2) trees of the same species.
2. The landowner shall protect all plant materials required by this Ordinance to maintain a protected tree in a healthy condition:
a. For each protected tree, there is a mandatory requirement to use 12-gauge hard four (4) foot high metal fencing around drip line of the tree.
b. Fencing shall be maintained throughout the entire construction process.
c. It shall be unlawful for any person to place soil in such a way that would cause live oaks to become diseased or die. If filling with soil is necessary to properly drain the land, all efforts should be made to protect the area within the drip line of a live oak from the impact of such activity. Should all efforts fail and a tree removal permit be issued for the removal of the live oak the provisions of these regulations regarding replacement of trees shall be required to be met.
3. If a protected tree is determined to be dead by both a licensed arborist and the City arborist, the protected tree can be removed administratively through the permit process outlined in Section 9.2.5.14, otherwise a variance will need to be applied for as outlined in Section 4.3.4.
Action on millages delayed to consider budget needs
Zuckerman taking reins as council chair
MANDEVILLE — In a move aimed at cleaning up parking near the Mandeville Trailhead, the City Council voted to restrict overnight parking in the Town Center District, but only after a minor kerfuffle among several of its members led to a few awkward moments.
Ordinance No. 25-03, adopted at the June 26th meeting, redefines “permanent parking” and prohibits it between the hours of 2 a.m. and 5 a.m. on key streets and city-owned lots, with specific exemptions for local residents.
The restricted zone includes both sides of Woodrow and General Pershing streets, from Girod Street to Carroll Street, as well as the city-owned parking lot at the Mandeville Trailhead.
The ordinance targets the longtime practice of overnight school bus parking and vehicles being repaired at a nearby body shop.
Tensions briefly flared during discussion of the ordinance when District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson appeared to assume the role of council chairman, a duty reserved under the City Charter for one of the two at-large council members.
When Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman requested to speak, Strong-Thompson interjected, “You’ve had the floor all night, but okay.” Council Chairman Scott Discon at first seemed to agree with her before relenting, “I’ve gave (sic) him the floor (to Strong-Thompson), but continue (to Zuckerman).”
Zuckerman responded, “That’s not appropriate,” to which Strong-Thompson unapologetically acknowledged, “I know.”
Strong-Thompson, known for speaking out of turn during council meetings, has occasionally spoken over Discon in his role as council chairman.
This most recent exchange underscored underlying procedural tensions on the council. As Zuckerman continued to press his concerns about the ordinance, he emphasized, “This is called debating an ordinance. We are allowed to express our opinion.”
Discon pushed back, saying, “But you’ve expressed your opinion and (unintelligible)…” Zuckerman concluded, “I think it’s completely inappropriate for comments like that, Ms. Thompson, and for you, Mr. Chairman. This is a debate. This is a council meeting. This is what we do.”
Despite the flareup, all council members voted in favor. District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz was absent from the vote.
Violations of the new ordinance carry escalating fines: $75 for a first offense, $150 for a second, and $300 for a third. The ordinance does not affect other parking prohibitions and does not apply to municipal vehicles performing official duties.
In other business at recent council meetings…
Electric bikes banned on sidewalks
The City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 25-04 on March 13th prohibiting most motorized conveyances — including so-called electric bikes — from operating on city sidewalks. The new law aims to improve pedestrian safety and preserve sidewalk access throughout the city.
Sponsored and introduced by District I Councilwoman Strong-Thompson, the ordinance defines “motorized conveyance” as any vehicle propelled by electric, gas, or battery power.
Under the ordinance, individuals over the age of 10 are not permitted to operate motorized vehicles on sidewalks. Children 10 years old or younger may operate devices traveling under 5 mph if done safely.
However, in business and commercial zones, such use is strictly prohibited unless signage permits it. The law makes exceptions for people with disabilities using mobility devices, law enforcement in the line of duty, and city workers or contractors performing official work.
Violators will receive a warning on their first offense, with subsequent violations carrying a fine of up to $50.
City officials emphasized that the new rules are part of a broader effort to balance pedestrian comfort with the presence of small motorized devices like scooters and e-bikes on public walkways.
Camping crackdown targets vagrants
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 25-16 on June 12th, establishing a citywide prohibition on camping activities on public property.
The ordinance defines “camping” as the recreational use of outdoor areas involving temporary shelters such as tents, huts, trailers, campers, or motorized and non-motorized recreational vehicles. It applies to public spaces including sidewalks, parks, rights-of-way, and underpasses, with an exception for registered vessels moored at City facilities.
Prior to final passage, the Council debated specific language in the ordinance. Assistant Police Chief David Greenwood reported complaints about vagrants camping in local parks, prompting discussion on how strictly the ordinance should be worded.
District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson successfully motioned to remove the phrase “and overnight sleeping” from the ordinance, a change supported by a 3-2 vote despite opposition from Councilwoman Jill Lane and Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman. District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz sought to further narrow the ordinance by removing references to recreational vehicles and later to “trailers, campers,” but both motions failed — one by a 4-1 vote, the other for lack of a second.
With the single amendment removing “and overnight sleeping,” the full ordinance passed unanimously, 5-0.
Council sets 2025 police millages, delays vote on general operations tax rate
The City Council on June 26th adopted two ordinances setting the city’s 2025 property tax rates to fund police operations, while postponing action on the general government millage after a third ordinance failed to pass on a 2-2 vote.
By a unanimous 4-0 vote, the council approved Ordinance 25-12, levying a 4.70-mill property tax on all taxable property in the city for the operation and maintenance of the Mandeville Police Department. The council also passed Ordinance 25-14, which increased the rate from 1.0 to 5.08 mills, a 4.08 increase, restoring the maximum allowable rate from the prior year. The change is expected to generate $1.27 million in total police funding, with $1.02 million attributed to the roll-forward.
A third measure, Ordinance 25-13, which sought to set the city’s general operations millage at 2.79 mills — down from 6.87 mills in 2024, a 4.08 decrease — and add a separate 0.34-mill levy for police, failed in a 2-2 tie. Councilman at Large Scott Discon and District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson voted in favor, while Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman and District III Councilwoman Jill Lane voted against. Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz was absent.
Zuckerman voiced concerns that approving it before the mayor’s proposed budget is presented could result in either over-taxing residents or falling short of planned expenditures.
As a result of the failure to adopt 25-13, the general operations millage remains unsettled, and is being re-advertised to meet state requirements but this time at the full rate approved by voters. This will allow the council to set the rate to precisely match the budget at the July 24th meeting.
Zuckerman takes over as council chairman July 10th
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman will be the new presiding officer at City Council meetings starting July 10th.
The two at-large council members alternate serving as council chairman, starting every July. District council members cannot serve in the position. Councilman at Large Scott Discon has been filling the post since taking office in 2024.
This will be Zuckerman’s third tenure as chairman since being elected in 2020.
Readers of Mandeville Daily may have noticed a slowdown in the frequency and consistency of local news coverage in recent months, particularly regarding City Council meetings and municipal developments. I want to take a moment to explain the reason behind the reduced reporting and thank you for your continued readership and support during this time.
Earlier this year, I sustained a back injury that significantly limited my ability to maintain my usual reporting schedule. The injury, while not life-threatening, required a great deal of time, rest, and treatment to heal properly. As a result, I had to step back from coverage and wasn’t able to keep up with the day-to-day pace of community reporting that readers had come to expect.
Over the past several months, I’ve focused my free time and energy on recovery and gradually returning to a more active lifestyle. I’m pleased to report that I’m now mostly recovered and, more importantly, ready to resume coverage of Mandeville City Council proceedings and other local issues that matter to our community.
Thank you for your patience and understanding. I look forward to returning to regular reporting very soon and continuing to keep you informed on the issues, decisions, and developments that shape life here in Mandeville.
Queer Northshore social media posts signal shift from original stated theme on application
Change to honor legacy of 1969 Stonewall Riots
Route includes Lakeshore Drive, Girod Street with ‘block party’ at Mandeville Trailhead
Trailhead events to include ‘drag performances’ on main stage
MANDEVILLE — Organizers of Queer Northshore’s “Pride Northshore Parade” have taken to social media to signal a shift from the original, council-approved “Celebration of Pride Month” theme to “Protesting with Pride.”
A Queer Northshore Instagram post explains the change in theme as follows:
“This year, as LGBTQ+ rights face relentless attacks from those in power, our theme — ‘Protesting with PRIDE’ — honors the bold legacy of the 1969 Stonewall Riots, which sparked the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement.”
The Stonewall Riots, which started on June 28, 1969, in New York City, marked a violent episode in the LGBTQ+ movement. A police raid on a popular gay bar sparked clashes that lasted for several days.
During the riots, at least 13 people were arrested and multiple injuries were reported as tensions flared between demonstrators and police. Protesters hurled bottles, bricks, and debris, leading to bloody clashes with police in the streets.
Additionally, Mandeville Daily was contacted by locals who said they were concerned about materials they discovered on the Queer Northshore’s official website, including a graphic describing a “colors of resistance” procession of ten flags during the parade, among them an upside-down U.S. flag and a Palestinian flag.
Jeremy Thompson and Mel Manuel deliver a video message to their supporters on Instagram. (Mandeville Daily)
“Regarding concerns about the inclusion of certain flags in this year’s Pride parade — specifically the Palestinian, Mexican, and upside-down American flags, we feel it is important to explain our values clearly,” the graphic reads.
Queer Northshore application adopted 3-1 by the City Council February 27, 2025, was described as “Celebration of PRIDE month.” (Mandeville Daily)
A message on another page of the website reads: “Pride is not neutral. It is not ‘just a celebration.’ It is a platform for resistance, solidarity, and truth-telling — even when that truth is uncomfortable.”
Screenshot of the Queer Northshore website on June 3, 2025. (Mandeville Daily)
One version of the graphic on the website was later changed to show a Ukrainian flag instead of the upside-down American flag, however, as of today (June 3rd), the original version with the upside-down American flag could still be found on the website.
Last year, Pro-Palestinian supporters with their banners, flags and symbols (watermelon logos and keffiyehs) marched in the parade through the predominantly Conservative Historic Old Mandeville neighborhood. According to surveys, most Conservatives are staunchly pro-Israel when it comes to the Israel-Palestinian debate.
The special events permit for 2025 was approved, 3-1, by the City Council on February 27th. Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, an ethnic Jew who recently converted to Catholicism, was the only council member who voted against it. District III Councilwoman Jill Lane was absent.
The parade is scheduled to roll down Lakeshore Drive and up Girod Street, culminating in a block party at the Mandeville Trailhead Saturday, from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m.
The Mandeville Police Department posted a reminder on Facebook that parking will not be permitted anywhere along the parade route and they plan to strictly enforce the rule:
There will be no parking along the entire parade route from 2 pm to 6 pm, and this will be strictly enforced. (Mandeville Police Department)
The Queer Northshore website on June 3, 2025. (Mandeville Daily)
Graphic from the Queer Northshore website on June 3, 2025. (Mandeville Daily)
Instagram posts from various pro-Palestinian groups who mades posts and claimed to have marched in the 2024 ‘Queer Northshore Parade.’ (Mandeville Daily)
Instagram posts from various pro-Palestinian groups who mades posts and claimed to have marched in the 2024 ‘Queer Northshore Parade.’ (Mandeville Daily)
Case on life-support as all claims dismissed except equal-protection challenge
MANDEVILLE — In a sweeping ruling that significantly narrows the legal battle over the proposed Sucette Harbor development, a federal judge has dismissed nearly all claims brought against the City of Mandeville by Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans.
However, the court has allowed one claim — alleging unequal treatment under the law — to proceed.
In this latest decision, the judge found that the developers failed to establish that the city violated their constitutional rights by rejecting a proposed zoning change and development plan for the controversial lakefront project.
Judge Long ruled that the plaintiffs lacked a “recognized species of property right” under Louisiana law to compel the City Council’s approval of their project. Federally, he found that the developers failed to demonstrate that the denial of the project deprived them of all economically beneficial use of the property, a crucial requirement under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Lucas decision.
The court also rejected the developers’ claims based on the Penn Central balancing test, noting that they failed to provide concrete evidence of substantial economic loss, unreasonable interference with investment-backed expectations, or any overreach by the city’s decision-making process.
The judge further emphasized that the plaintiffs’ complaints about disorganized public meetings, inconsistent application of rules, and opposition from council members amounted to “conclusory allegations” that lacked sufficient evidence to support a due process violation.
Equal Protection Claim Survives
Despite dismissing most of the case, Judge Long allowed one claim to proceed: an allegation that the city treated the Sucette Harbor project differently from other marinas in Mandeville. The developers argue that they faced stricter conditions and penalties not applied to similar developments, which could potentially violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Under Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, a U.S. Supreme Court case adopted by the Fifth Circuit, such “class-of-one” claims can proceed when plaintiffs allege intentional, arbitrary discrimination.
Judge Long concluded that the plaintiffs’ factual allegations on this point were sufficient, at least at the motion-to-dismiss stage, to warrant further examination through discovery and litigation.
Implications for the Plaintiffs
This ruling is a devastating blow for the plaintiffs, who have now lost nearly all their legal arguments. Their remaining path in federal court hinges on proving that the city engaged in discriminatory treatment by imposing unfair restrictions on the Sucette Harbor project.
The judge’s opinion also reaffirms the broad discretion of local governments in land-use decisions, particularly when those decisions are made through established legislative processes.
The surviving equal protection claim could still pose challenges for the city, especially if it is found to have applied zoning rules inconsistently. However, the overall momentum of the case has shifted decisively in favor of the city.
Zuckerman shielded by qualified immunity — all claims dismissed ‘with prejudice’
Says Zuckerman is immune from developer’s claims under federal and state law
Seen as major setback for plaintiffs in pending suit against city
MANDEVILLE — In a major development in the high-profile Sucette Harbor lawsuit, a federal judge has dismissed all claims against Mandeville City Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, citing qualified immunity. The ruling significantly narrows the scope of the ongoing legal battle over the proposed waterfront development along Lake Pontchartrain.
Zuckerman was dismissed “with prejudice” because the court found he was immune and the plaintiffs didn’t have enough legal grounds to sue him — even with potential amendments. It means the case is permanently closed and cannot be refiled in the future.
The decision, issued today, March 27th, by U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long, grants Zuckerman’s motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs — Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans — failed to plead sufficient facts to overcome his immunity from liability under both federal and Louisiana law.
Zuckerman Protected by Qualified Immunity
The court ruled that Zuckerman was acting within his rights as an elected official when he voted against the development and participated in related public deliberations. Although the plaintiffs accused him of improperly influencing the decision and acting with personal bias, the judge concluded that none of Zuckerman’s alleged actions violated “clearly established” law.
“Qualified immunity protects all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law,” the ruling states, adding that the plaintiffs failed to cite any binding legal precedent indicating Zuckerman’s conduct was unlawful. As a result, the court determined that Zuckerman is shielded from liability.
Judge Long noted that the plaintiffs did not provide a single example from Supreme Court or Fifth Circuit case law that would have put Zuckerman on notice that his alleged behavior—ranging from seeking outside input to criticizing the project’s design—violated any constitutional rights.
Implications for the Broader Case
Zuckerman had been a central figure in the lawsuit, which accuses the City of Mandeville and its council of unlawfully rejecting the proposed Sucette Harbor development. The project, proposed by Woodward Harbor on land owned by LSU Health Foundation, included an 82-room hotel, age-restricted apartments, a marina, and a restaurant. The City Council unanimously rejected the plan in September 2023 after nine public hearings.
The dismissal of claims against Zuckerman — one of the project’s most vocal critics — represents a legal setback for the plaintiffs. They had alleged that he improperly influenced the process, misused procedural rules, and imposed arbitrary conditions to block the project. But the judge ruled that those allegations did not rise to the level of a constitutional or legal violation.
Additionally, the court declined to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint against Zuckerman, citing a lack of any indication that new facts would change the legal outcome.
City Still Faces Legal Challenge
While the claims against Zuckerman have been dismissed, the broader lawsuit against the City of Mandeville continues. The plaintiffs are pursuing multiple claims under the U.S. and Louisiana constitutions, including allegations of regulatory takings, due process violations, and unequal treatment under the law.
The dismissal of Zuckerman may be seen as a precursor to how the court views similar allegations against the city itself, particularly regarding legislative immunity and procedural fairness.
This ruling follows a series of recent legal moves, including a motion to dismiss filed by a group of residents and conservationists who have also sought to intervene in the case. That motion argues that the developers lack any protected property interest in the zoning decision and that no taking occurred under state or federal law.
As the legal dispute presses on, the outcome of this case may have far-reaching consequences not only for the future of the Sucette Harbor property but also for the interpretation of land use powers in municipalities across Louisiana.
Also, council to consider doubling number of short-term rental permits
MANDEVILLE — A representative from the St. Tammany Parish Library Board of Control will address the Mandeville City Council at its March 13th regular meeting, urging citizens to support the renewal of a 15-year, 4.35-mill property tax to fund the parish’s public library system.
The tax, set for a March 29th ballot vote, is stated to provide funding for library facilities, furnishings, equipment, and operations.
The library system has faced controversy in recent years over allegedly offensive materials in children’s sections purportedly relating to what critics call the LGBTQ+ agenda.
This led to a major shake-up on May 4, when the Parish Council replaced five of six board members.
The upcoming presentation aims to make the case for continued funding amid these ongoing debates.
The City of Mandeville is proposing an amendment to Section 10-38(b) of the Mandeville Code of Ordinances to establish temporary one-way traffic on a section of Jefferson Street during school carline hours. The ordinance would place a “Do Not Enter” sign on Jefferson Street between Carroll Street and Lafitte Street during 7:00-8:00 AM and 1:30-2:30 PM on school days, allowing traffic to flow only eastward. This change is being implemented to help reduce congestion and improve traffic flow near Our Lady of the Lake School.
If passed, the ordinance will authorize the Mandeville Police Department to install and maintain the necessary signage to enforce the temporary one-way designation. All other existing traffic regulations in Section 10-38(b) will remain unchanged. The amendment will take effect upon the Mayor’s signature, ensuring that the city can manage school-related traffic more efficiently while enhancing public safety.
Presentations:
St. Tammany Library Millage Renewal
The St. Tammany Parish public library system is seeking a dedicated property tax renewal on the March 29th, 2025, ballot. The parish proposes a 15-year, 4.35 mill tax to fund public library facilities, furnishings, equipment, and operations.
Children’s Museum of St. Tammany
Shelly Winstead presenting.
Special Event Permits:
‘Girod Street Stroll’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Old Mandeville Business Association- “Girod Street Stroll” event to be held April 12, 2025 from 5:00-9:00 p.m. Rain Date: April 19, 2025. Location: Girod St.(see map) Approval Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit contingent upon ATC permit, Certificate of Insurance, and coordination with MPD for barricades, signs, and cones.
‘City of Mandeville National Day of Prayer’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event Permit Application for the City of Mandeville- “National Day of Prayer” to be held on May 1, 2025 from 12:00-1:00 p.m. Rain Date: N/A Location: Mandeville Lakefront (between Lafitte and Carroll Street) Approval Requests: Lift ordinance of food/ drinks on the lakefront and approve tent and chair setup.
Unfinished Business:
(none)
New Business:
Approval of Liquor License (Aperitif restaurant)
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of Liquor License – Aperitif Spritz and Bites Restaurant located at 1943 Lakeshore Drive, Mandeville.
Approval of Change Order (asphalt and re-striping)
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of Change Order No. 5 for the 2022 Asphalt Maintenance Contract to add permanent and temporary pavement marking and legends items needed to re-stripe roadway segments. No change in maximum contract amount or time needed.
Approval of Task Order (drainage maintenance)
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of the 2022 Roadway and Drainage Maintenance Task Order No. 9 Substantial Completion Certificate.
Adoption of Ordinance 25-02 (short-term rentals increase)
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
The City of Mandeville is proposing amendments to its Comprehensive Land Use Regulations Ordinance (CLURO) regarding short-term rentals (STRs), specifically Whole House Rentals. The ordinance aims to update permit fees, liability insurance requirements, and the cap on rental permits.
Key changes include:
Increased Permit Fees: The initial application fee for a Whole House Rental will be raised to $1,000, and the renewal fee to $500.
Higher Insurance Requirements: Owners of short-term rental properties must now carry liability insurance of at least $1,000,000, up from the previous $500,000 requirement.
Expansion of Permit Cap: The total number of Whole House Rental permits allowed in the city will be increased from 10 to 20.
These changes are intended to enhance public safety, ensure compliance with local regulations, and accommodate growing demand for short-term rentals while continuing to monitor their impact on the community. All other existing provisions related to short-term rentals will remain unchanged.
Adoption of Ordinance 25-04 (ban motorized transport on sidewalks)
(District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson)
The City of Mandeville is proposing Ordinance No. 25-04, which would regulate the use of motorized conveyances on sidewalks to enhance public safety and pedestrian accessibility. Under this ordinance, individuals over the age of 10 would be prohibited from operating motorized vehicles—such as electric or gas-powered scooters—on sidewalks within the city. However, children 10 years old or younger would be allowed to use motorized conveyances under 5 mph, provided they do so safely. The ordinance also bans motorized conveyances on sidewalks in business and commercial districts, unless permitted by signage.
Certain exceptions are outlined, including mobility devices for individuals with disabilities, law enforcement officers on duty, and city workers performing maintenance. The ordinance establishes penalties for violations, with a warning for the first offense and fines up to $50 for repeat violations. If passed, the ordinance will go into effect upon the Mayor’s signature.
Adoption of Resolution 25-05 (LDEQ compliance notification)
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
The City of Mandeville is notifying the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) about actions taken to comply with municipal water pollution prevention and wastewater discharge permit requirements under the Louisiana Water Discharge Permit System (LPDES). The resolution confirms that the City Council has reviewed an environmental audit report and outlines ongoing and future measures to ensure regulatory compliance and improve wastewater management.
Key actions include training certified operators, conducting inflow and infiltration (I&I) testing, monitoring wetland discharges, maintaining rock-reed filtration efficiency, and ensuring proper aeration and biological treatment. The city also plans to upgrade lift stations, prevent collection system overflows, enhance environmental monitoring, and explore alternative disinfection methods for wastewater discharge. These steps aim to maintain permit compliance, improve water treatment efficiency, and protect the local environment.
Adoption of Resolution 25-06 (wetlands restoration project)
(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)
The City of Mandeville is authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to its Professional Services Agreement with Neel-Schaffer, Inc. for the Mandeville Lakefront Wetlands Restoration Project. The amendment reflects additional work requested by the city, including adding a rip rap cap, updating geotechnical and hydraulic reports, adjusting berm elevations, revising permitting documents, and incorporating the Galvez Diversion Channel excavation and marsh creation as a bid alternate.
To accommodate these changes, the consultant’s professional service fees will increase by $18,281, and the contract’s expiration date will be extended by one year to April 14, 2026. The amendment ensures the necessary survey, design, and bidding services are completed for the wetlands restoration efforts.
Adoption of Resolution 25-07 (endorse parish sales tax renewal)
(Councilmen at large Scott Discon and Jason Zuckerman)
The City of Mandeville is expressing its support for the renewal and partial rededication of the existing 2% sales tax in Sales Tax District No. 3 of St. Tammany Parish, which will be put to a public vote on March 29, 2025. This tax, originally levied in 1986 and last renewed in 2006, has been used exclusively for road, street, bridge, and drainage improvements within the district.
The proposed renewal will not introduce new taxes but will rededicate a portion of the proceeds to help fund essential law enforcement-related entities in the parish. The City Council supports the measure as necessary for public safety, warning that if it fails, St. Tammany Parish may struggle to meet its mandated funding obligations, potentially leading to staff reductions and operational cuts in law enforcement, which could jeopardize community safety.
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman had the audacity to vote against it, although it still passed, 3-1. (District III Councilwoman Jill Lane, formerly McGuire, was absent.)
But who does he think he is, going around voting on things as he sees fit? Where was the city attorney when we needed her to step up and tell Mr. Zuckerman how he is supposed to vote?
You can’t let freedom just ring willy nilly. Democracy will never survive people voting their conscience.
But seriously folks…
Let’s explore why someone would vote against a parade by an organization whose stated purpose is to bring awareness to their struggle for equal rights, especially after that certain someone voted in favor of it last year.
Transgender ideology objections
We would have to start with the fact that most Conservatives see the LGBTQ+ movement as having been hijacked by what they feel is a radical transgender ideology.
According to numerous polls, including one from Gallup, most Americans — not just Conservatives — oppose the notion of biological males competing as “girls” against biological females in grade school, high school, and collegiate sports. Moreover, they disapprove of biological males sharing locker rooms and bathrooms with their underage daughters. The issue exploded in the months leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election which saw Donald Trump win in a landslide.
So if you ask most Conservatives, their opposition to this group has little or nothing to do with gay, lesbian or bisexual.
Queer Northshore’s co-founder is a transgender Democrat named Mel Manuel who ran unsuccessfully for Louisiana’s 1st Congressional District against Steve Scalise in 2024. Manuel, who campaigned on a platform of abortion rights, universal basic income, and gun control, advocated for transgender rights during the campaign, once even receiving a Testosterone injection on a video posted to the internet.
Naturally, this opposition from Conservatives reflected in polling is going to manifest itself as pushback to a self-ascribed LGBTQ+ organization with a transgender-rights activist organizer and their “Pride Northshore Parade” in Mandeville’s mostly Republican, historic M04 precinct.
That’s it in a nutshell, whether you like it or not. I’m just the one telling you how it is.
Pro-Palestinian connections
Another challenge for Queer Northshore in a predominantly Conservative neighborhood is their perceived association with local pro-Palestinian groups. Pro-Palestinian supporters with their banners, flags and symbols (watermelon logos and keffiyehs) marched in the 2024 “Queer Northshore Parade” which was issued a permit as “CELEBRATION OF PRIDE MONTH” and not a pro-Palestinian event. Most Conservatives are staunchly pro-Israel when it comes to the Israel-Palestinian war that’s currently in a fragile ceasefire.
Americans almost daily see images on TV and social media of pro-Palestinian groups on college campuses in other parts of the country blocking Jewish students from attending their classes, burning American flags and other actions that Conservatives typically find offensive. So this association with local pro-Palestinian groups is seen as a tough pill to swallow for someone with Jewish lineage.
Mr. Zuckerman is an ethnic Jew, who recently converted to Catholicism.
Instagram posts from various pro-Palestinian groups who mades posts and claimed to have marched in the 2024 ‘Queer Northshore Parade.’ (Mandeville Daily)
Instagram posts from various pro-Palestinian groups who mades posts and claimed to have marched in the 2024 ‘Queer Northshore Parade.’ (Mandeville Daily)
And on February 27th, he was the only council member who voted against the 2025 “Pride Northshore Parade” permit.
Progressive Democrats would say he’s a bigot. Republicans would say he did what he was elected to do.
He was twice endorsed by the St. Tammany Republican Parish Executive Committee (RPEC) in 2020 and 2024.
So was Mr. Zuckerman’s “no” vote really all that surprising to anyone? He gave no explanation nor did anyone ask him.
So why would several of the 20 or so Queer Northshore supporters who attended the February 27th meeting feel it was necessary to wait for Mr. Zuckerman outside? They had filed out of Council Chambers after their victory over 15 minutes earlier. Most of those inside the building thought they had left after their victory, which, by the way, is typical for most organizations after their special event permits are approved. These meetings can be very long.
But as we would learn later, they had in fact not gone anywhere. Most of them were still hanging out near the front entrance while three or four others waited by Mr. Zuckerman’s vehicle at the side entrance. They were observed for some time from inside the building before adjournment. That’s why the police officer escorted him to his vehicle. It was out of an abundance of caution.
Don’t lie in wait
In today’s world, it’s not a good idea to wait in the dark for an elected official after a controversial vote. Even if you have no ill intentions, your actions could easily be misinterpreted.
And it has nothing to do with this group in particular or its supporters. This advice goes for everyone, whether you’re wearing LGBTQ+ shirts, red MAGA hats, keffiyehs, kippahs, or you’re just pissed off they voted to raise your water rates.
Don’t do it. You’re inviting trouble.
Perhaps their intentions were to engage in a “discussion” with Mr. Zuckerman about his earlier vote. Maybe they wanted to express their admiration for his unwavering commitment to his beliefs despite being different from their own. Or perhaps it was something worse.
Who knows. Fortunately, we didn’t have to find out, as Mr. Zuckerman made it safely to his vehicle with the police officer at his side, as the three or four individuals did a simultaneous about-face.
But what happened next is a real head-scratcher. Some of these individuals apparently thought it would be a good idea to make a few allegedly vulgar hand gestures and then follow Mr. Zuckerman after he left in his vehicle. The police officer saw it and called Mr. Zuckerman, advising him which route to take in order to determine if he was really being followed. After making several turns from Lambert Street to Lafitte Street, ending near Lakeshore Drive, the car in question quit following when Mr. Zuckerman made an abrupt turn onto a side street, according to his account of the incident.
They got the license plate number, but it was Mr. Zuckerman who opted not to have the police take action.
Despite what some folks have posted on social media, this incident really did happen. I saw the whole thing.
Everyone needs to understand, this is Mandeville, not Seattle, not San Francisco, and not New York City. This type of intimidating behavior — even if it could be explained away as an unfortunate series of coincidences — is not acceptable.
One of the comments posted to Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman’s Facebook page after his ‘no’ vote.
Council response needed
What happened to Mr. Zuckerman needs to be unequivocally addressed by the City Council, either via resolution, a statement from the mayor, or both.
At least Mandeville Police Chief Todd Schliem immediately stepped up and issued the following:
“Our public servants are fulfilling a sacred civic duty to serve our wonderful community. No one should ever be subjected to threats or intimidation, especially a public official over a disagreement with a public policy position.”
You’re a good man, Charlie Brown.
But now we’re hearing that the other RPEC-endorsed councilman at large, Mr. Discon, has been sending congratulatory response emails to Queer Northshore supporters. Maybe he’ll speak out against what happened to Mr. Zuckerman while he’s at it. That would be very Republican of him, assuming he intends to seek the RPEC endorsement again in 2028.
If this mob behavior is met with silence or timidity, you’re only inviting more of it, regardless of which group it is. Worse still, you’re signaling to your voters that they should remain silent themselves, lest they face similar retribution.
If this City Council doesn’t acknowledge the events that transpired and publicly defend their fellow council member, then what good are they to anyone?
Residents and environmental group argue plaintiffs have no protected property rights
MANDEVILLE — The legal battle over the controversial Sucette Harbor development continues to escalate, as a group of local residents and environmental advocates who recently sought to intervene in the case have now filed a motion to dismiss several claims made by the developers.
The motion, filed by Intervenors Lawrence Grundmann, Kathleen Grundmann, Emory Clark, Thomas Snedeker, Robert Ellis, Emily Ellis, Walter Bahn, Mary Bahn, Ellen O’Connell, James K. O’Connell, Tom Whalen, Teri Whalen, Ralph Whalen, Christopher G. Brantley, Ph.D., and the Orleans Audubon Society, argues that Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans have failed to establish a valid legal claim under both state and federal law. The Intervenors contend that because the Mandeville City Council has full discretion over zoning changes, the plaintiffs cannot claim they had a protected property interest in the approval of their development proposal.
Challenging Key Claims in the Case
The Intervenors’ filing specifically seeks to dismiss Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of the plaintiffs’ lawsuit, which include takings claims under the Louisiana Constitution, federal due process claims, and claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion asserts that:
The developers do not have a constitutionally protected property right in obtaining zoning changes or conditional use permits.
Louisiana law does not recognize a “right to develop” property unless a permit has already been granted, which is not the case here.
Regulatory takings claims require total deprivation of economic value, but the plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the property has been rendered completely useless.
Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are baseless, as the rejection of a zoning request by an elected city council does not violate due process rights.
Citing a recent federal court ruling in Plaquemines Parish Ventures, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Council, the Intervenors argue that zoning decisions by elected bodies are considered legislative actions, meaning procedural due process claims do not apply.
Next Steps in the Legal Battle
The motion to dismiss comes after the failure of court-ordered settlement talks between the developers, the City of Mandeville, and Councilman Jason Zuckerman. With no agreement reached, and the Intervenors now actively challenging key claims, the case is poised to proceed through federal litigation.
Legal analysts suggest that if the court grants the motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs’ case could be significantly weakened, possibly forcing them to refocus their arguments on remaining claims, such as equal protection.
Meanwhile, environmental advocates see this as a crucial step in preventing what they argue is an ecologically harmful and legally dubious development in the Sucette Harbor area. A ruling on the motion is expected in the coming weeks.
Several ‘Queer Northshore’ proponents waited by Zuckerman’s vehicle
Police officer escorted Zuckerman to vehicle
Zuckerman, witness reported ‘Pride’ supporters followed him in car from City Hall to lakefront
MANDEVILLE — A gaggle of ‘Queer Northshore’ supporters attempted to confront Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman in the City Hall parking lot near his vehicle, immediately after Thursday’s City Council meeting where he was the sole ‘no’ vote against the ‘Pride Northshore Parade’ special event permit, which passed 3-1.
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman (City of Mandeville)
The same group — after seemingly being dispersed by a police officer who had to escort Zuckerman to his vehicle when witnesses reported a group lying in wait for him — hopped into their own vehicle and followed him for several miles to the lakefront, where Zuckerman made a series of turns to finally to lose the tail, according to Zuckerman.
Another witness captured the license plate number of the pursuing vehicle which has been turned over to Mandeville Police.
Mandeville Police Chief Todd Schliem issued the following statement in response to a Mandeville Daily query:
“Our public servants are fulfilling a sacred civic duty to serve our wonderful community. No one should ever be subjected to threats or intimidation, especially a public official over a disagreement with a public policy position.”
It is unclear what effect this incident could have on the standing of the ‘Pride Northshore Parade’ permit approved earlier in the meeting.
MANDEVILLE — The City Council voted 3-1 to approve a special event permit for the “Pride Northshore” parade down Lakeshore Drive scheduled for June 7th.
Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman voted against the permit. District III Councilwoman Jill Lane (formerly McGuire) was absent.
Queer Northshore was asking the City Council to approve its “Pride Northsore” parade special events permit tonight so that the group can parade down Lakeshore Drive for the second year in a row.
The application requests the closure of Lakeshore Drive in Old Mandeville starting at Jackson Avenue and ending at the Mandeville Trailhead on Girod Street on Saturday, June 7th, from 4 to 9 p.m.
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for City of Mandeville — “Mandeville Live” to be held Fridays (March 21, 2025 – May 9, 2025) 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Location: Mandeville Trailhead. Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol permit Contingency: ATC permit.
‘Mandeville Family Reunion’: Approved 4-0
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Susan Brady- “Mandeville Family Reunion” to be held May 25, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Mandeville Lakefront- stage near Lafayette Street. Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.
‘Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk’: Approved 4-0
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Sherrard Crespo — “Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk” to be held on April 12, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. – 11:30 p.m. Location: Lakefront Harbor to Gazebo Walk Path Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.
‘Mandeville Food Truck Festival’: Approved 4-0
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Mandeville Lion’s Club — “Mandeville Food Truck Festival” to be held on May 10, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Private Property (Mandeville Lion’s Club) Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol Permit. Contingency: ATC permit.
‘Queer Northshore: Pride Northshore Parade’: Approved 3-1 (Zuckerman against)
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application and Parade Route Approval for Queer Northshore — “Pride Northshore Parade” to be held on June 7, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Location: Lakeshore Boat Launch to Trailhead (see map) Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit and parade route approval. Contingency: ATC permit and parade route approval.
‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’ date change: Approved 4-0
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
“Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” Event was approved on 2-13-25 and requires approval for a date change to 3-2-25 from 12:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m. Location: Copal St (Between Cindy Lou and Live Oak). Approval Requests: Date change to 3-2-25 .
Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. The original version of the agenda did not include the above item.
New Business:
Approval of Liquor License: Approved 4-0
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the liquor license for “Iceburg Charlie’s” (sic).
Ordinance 25-01 amends the City of Mandeville’s Operating Budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year to allocate additional funding for social services. This adjustment, outlined in Budget Amendment No. 6 (Social Services) and detailed in the attached Exhibit “A,” is necessary due to expenditures exceeding the originally approved budget. The amendment follows the financial procedures set by the city’s Home Rule Charter. All other provisions of the original budget ordinance (Ordinance No. 24-22) will remain unchanged.
Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. This item has been removed from the latest version of the agenda.
Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.
Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville. (Mandeville Daily)
Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.
The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.
Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.
A side-by-side comparison of the changes proposed by Ordinance 25-06 to city code. (Mandeville Daily)
Resolution 25-04 authorizes the Mayor of Mandeville to execute Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement between the city and Waggonner & Ball, Inc. The original agreement, established on May 15, 2023, covered various design and engineering services for the Police Department Building Design project. Since the estimated construction cost has increased from $4 million to $7.207 million, the consultant’s fee must be recalculated accordingly. The resolution ensures that the revised agreement reflects the updated cost estimate while maintaining the original scope of professional services.
Queer Northshore is asking the City Council to approve it’s “Pride Northsore” parade special events permit tonight so that the group can parade down Lakeshore Drive for the second year in a row.
The application requests the closure of Lakeshore Drive in Old Mandeville starting at Jackson Avenue and ending at or near Coffee Street on Saturday, June 7th, from 4 to 9 p.m.
Ordinance 25-04 would regulate the use of motorized conveyances on sidewalks within the City of Mandeville to enhance public safety and pedestrian accessibility. The ordinance defines motorized conveyances as any vehicle propelled by electric, gas, or battery power, excluding mobility devices for individuals with disabilities. Recognizing potential hazards posed by these vehicles, the city aims to balance the needs of different modes of transportation while prioritizing pedestrian safety.
Under the proposed ordinance, individuals over the age of ten are prohibited from operating motorized conveyances on sidewalks. Children aged ten and younger may use such devices under 5 mph, provided they do so safely without endangering or obstructing pedestrians. Additionally, motorized conveyances are strictly prohibited in business and commercial districts unless specifically allowed by signage. Exceptions are made for mobility devices, law enforcement officers performing official duties, and city workers or contractors who need access for maintenance or construction purposes.
Violations of the ordinance would result in a warning for the first offense, while subsequent violations may lead to a fine of up to $50 per occurrence. The ordinance includes a severability clause, ensuring that if any part of it is deemed invalid, the remaining provisions will still be enforceable.
Special Event Permits:
‘Mandeville Live’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for City of Mandeville — “Mandeville Live” to be held Fridays (March 21, 2025 – May 9, 2025) 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Location: Mandeville Trailhead. Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol permit Contingency: ATC permit.
‘Mandeville Family Reunion’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Susan Brady- “Mandeville Family Reunion” to be held May 25, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Mandeville Lakefront- stage near Lafayette Street. Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.
‘Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Sherrard Crespo — “Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk” to be held on April 12, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. – 11:30 p.m. Location: Lakefront Harbor to Gazebo Walk Path Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.
‘Mandeville Food Truck Festival’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Mandeville Lion’s Club- “Mandeville Food Truck Festival” to be held on May 10, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Private Property (Mandeville Lion’s Club) Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol Permit. Contingency: ATC permit.
‘Queer Northshore: Pride Northshore Parade’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application and Parade Route Approval for Queer Northshore — “Pride Northshore Parade” to be held on June 7, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Location: Lakeshore Boat Launch to Trailhead (see map) Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit and parade route approval. Contingency: ATC permit and parade route approval.
‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’ date change
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
“Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” Event was approved on 2-13-25 and requires approval for a date change to 3-2-25 from 12:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m. Location: Copal St (Between Cindy Lou and Live Oak). Approval Requests: Date change to 3-2-25 .
Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. The original version of the agenda did not include the above item.
New Business:
Approval of Liquor License
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the liquor license for “Iceburg Charlie’s” (sic).
Ordinance 25-01 amends the City of Mandeville’s Operating Budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year to allocate additional funding for social services. This adjustment, outlined in Budget Amendment No. 6 (Social Services) and detailed in the attached Exhibit “A,” is necessary due to expenditures exceeding the originally approved budget. The amendment follows the financial procedures set by the city’s Home Rule Charter. All other provisions of the original budget ordinance (Ordinance No. 24-22) will remain unchanged.
Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. This item has been removed from the latest version of the agenda.
Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.
Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville. (Mandeville Daily)
Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.
The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.
Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.
A side-by-side comparison of the changes proposed by Ordinance 25-06 to city code. (Mandeville Daily)
Resolution 25-04 authorizes the Mayor of Mandeville to execute Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement between the city and Waggonner & Ball, Inc. The original agreement, established on May 15, 2023, covered various design and engineering services for the Police Department Building Design project. Since the estimated construction cost has increased from $4 million to $7.207 million, the consultant’s fee must be recalculated accordingly. The resolution ensures that the revised agreement reflects the updated cost estimate while maintaining the original scope of professional services.
Legal battle over controversial development continues as residents seek to join the case
City Council to meet in executive session to discuss
MANDEVILLE — A federal court-ordered settlement conference in the ongoing Sucette Harbor lawsuit failed to produce a resolution, leaving the case to proceed through litigation.
The conference, held on February 24th before U.S. Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier in the Eastern District of Louisiana, brought together representatives from the key parties, including Woodward Harbor LLC, LSU Health Foundation New Orleans, the City of Mandeville, and individual litigant Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman. However, after over two hours of discussions, no settlement was reached.
The lawsuit, originally filed under Civil Action No. 23-5824, stems from a legal dispute over the proposed Sucette Harbor development rejected by the City Council in 2023. Woodward Harbor LLC and its partners have been at odds with the City of Mandeville over land use, zoning, and environmental concerns, while LSU Health Foundation New Orleans and Zuckerman have also entered the legal battle with separate interests.
In a related development, a coalition of local residents and environmental advocates filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit on February 21st. This group seeks to have their voices heard in the legal proceedings, expressing concerns about the potential environmental impact of the proposed development on the Sucette Harbor area. Their involvement could introduce new perspectives and potentially complicate the litigation further.
Despite the failure to reach an agreement, the court has left the door open for further discussions. Judge Dossier advised that counsel for the parties may seek further assistance from the court if needed.
The City Council scheduled a special meeting for tonight at 6 p.m. to discuss the matter in an executive session, which in accordance with state law will be closed to the public.
With the impasse at the settlement table, the case is expected to move forward in federal court, where further legal proceedings will determine the future of the contested development.
-30-
Minute entry from Sucette Harbor settlement conference February 24th, 2025. (Mandeville Daily)
The long-debated, often-criticized Sucette Harbor project was rejected September 5th, 2023, after a months-long process that generated a groundswell of opposition to building a hotel, events center, and apartment complex in the middle of a residential area at the west end of the Mandeville Lakefront.
The intervenors — a group of homeowners, a biologist, and the Orleans Audubon Society — petitioned the court to allow them to participate in the case, citing their personal, environmental, and property-related interests.
Sucette Harbor was a proposed development for the western end of the Mandeville lakefront. (Mandeville Daily)
The proposed intervenors include Lawrence Grundmann, Kathleen Grundmann, Emory Clark, Thomas Snedeker, Robert Ellis, Emily Ellis, Walter Bahn, Mary Bahn, Ellen A. O’Connell, James K. O’Connell, Tom Whalen, Teri Whalen, Ralph Whalen, Dr. Christopher G. Brantley, and the Orleans Audubon Society.
Their motion argues that the Sucette Harbor project will have severe environmental consequences, increase traffic congestion, and negatively impact property values in the area. They further claim that previous marina projects in the same location have led, or would have led, to disastrous results for Mandeville and its residents.
The Orleans Audubon Society and Dr. Christopher Brantley, a professional biologist, are particularly concerned with the project’s impact on wildlife habitats, including critical areas for migratory birds and native species. Their motion states that the project will destroy old-growth trees, disrupt wetland ecosystems, and contribute to increased erosion along the Lake Pontchartrain shoreline.
Additionally, the intervenors contend that the City of Mandeville’s Comprehensive Land Use Regulations Ordinance (CLURO) is not being properly followed, and that they have a distinct legal interpretation of these regulations that differs from both the plaintiffs and the defendants.
The Sucette Complaint, originally filed on October 5th, 2023 by Woodward Harbor LLC and the LSU Health Foundation New Orleans, alleges that the city improperly restricted development on the plaintiff’s land, violating property rights under the Takings Clause and other legal doctrines.
The city and co-defendant Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman have responded with multiple motions to dismiss, arguing that the case lacks merit or is not yet ripe for judicial review.
The proposed intervenors now seek to join the case as defendants, aligning with the city’s opposition to the project, but from an environmental and residential protection perspective rather than an economic or regulatory one.
The intervenors have also requested an expedited hearing and oral arguments, urging the court to consider their position before any settlement discussions or rulings take place.
The settlement conference is scheduled for Monday, February 24th.
If granted, their intervention would expand the scope of the litigation to include broader environmental and community-based concerns. If denied, they may need to pursue separate legal action or advocacy efforts to prevent the development from moving forward.
The court has yet to schedule a hearing on the motion, but with multiple dismissal motions, settlement discussions, and now an intervention request pending, the case is rapidly evolving. Legal analysts suggest that this new development could significantly influence the trajectory of the lawsuit and its potential outcomes for Mandeville residents, conservationists, and developers alike.
This remains a developing story, and further updates will follow as the court considers the intervention request and other pending motions.
MANDEVILLE — A cherished community cat named Boots, known for his friendly nature and iconic white “boots” on all four feet, was found dead this morning on the street near “The Bean” coffee shop. It appears that Boots was struck by a vehicle in the pre-dawn hours on Girod Street.
Boots the cat with Tommy the Turtle outside The Bean in June 2024. (Mandeville Daily)
For years, Boots had been a familiar and welcome presence at The Bean, where he was allowed to come and go as he pleased. Many patrons brought him food and treats while enjoying their Saturday morning coffee, and he never hesitated to share their company.
Boots’ passing is a heartbreaking loss for the neighborhood, as he had become a beloved fixture in the community. His gentle and affectionate nature made him a favorite among customers and staff alike.
With all nine lives extinguished, Boots was temporarily moved out of the street where he was found in the pre-dawn hours. (Mandeville Daily)
“He was part of the experience here,” said one regular. “Saturday mornings won’t be the same without him.”
Another cat, a gray Maine Coon mix who preferred to remain anonymous, was discovered standing guard over the body in the dark, apparently mourning the loss. The gray Maine Coon is not believed to be connected to the death of Boots.
Though Boots is gone, his memory will live on in the hearts of those who knew him. Community members are already sharing fond memories of him, and some have suggested putting up a small memorial near The Bean in his honor.
Mandeville implements new parking restrictions for Krewe of Eve parade amid safety concerns
MANDEVILLE — In response to recent safety concerns, the City of Mandeville has announced new security measures for the 2025 Krewe of Eve Mardi Gras Parade, scheduled to roll on Friday, February 21st.
According to a press release from the Mandeville Police Department, parking will no longer be allowed along the parade route roadsides, medians or shoulders this year. Officials say this decision is aimed at enhancing public safety and reducing potential risks for both spectators and parade participants.
“We understand this change might be inconvenient for some, as parking along the parade route has been a long-standing tradition,” the statement reads. “However, considering current circumstances, we believe this precaution is necessary to minimize potential risks.”
The move follows the New Year’s Day terror attack in New Orleans, as cities across Louisiana reassess their security measures for large public gatherings, especially during Mardi Gras season, which attracts thousands of revelers.
Paradegoers are encouraged to plan ahead for parking alternatives and to follow all city guidelines to ensure a safe and enjoyable event. Law enforcement officials also urge the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity.
Statement from the Mandeville Police Department (February 11th):
Considering recent events and our continuous commitment to prioritize public safety, the City of Mandeville is implementing new security measures for the upcoming Krewe of Eve Parade, scheduled for February 21, 2025.
Parking will not be allowed on the parade route or the opposite side of the streets along the parade route this year. This measure is intended to help mitigate threats to the safety and security of all attendees and participants.
We understand this change might be inconvenient for some, as parking along the parade route has been a long-standing tradition. However, considering current circumstances, we believe this precaution is necessary to minimize potential risks.
We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in helping us work towards a safer and more enjoyable parade for everyone.
Ordinance 25-03 not carried over from canceled Jan. 23 meeting
Executive session called to discuss Sucette Harbor lawsuits
Editor’s Note: The Councilwoman from District III notified the City Council that she legally changed her name from “Jill McGuire” to “Jill Lane.” Mandeville Daily will refer to her accordingly moving forward.
MANDEVILLE — A controversial parking ordinance will not be introduced at the February 13th City Council meeting as had been expected after the cancellation of the January 23rd meeting where it was slated for introduction on the published agenda.
The Discon ordinance — which created a stir on social media — was the only voting item not to be carrying over from the January 23rd meeting after it was canceled due to snow.
Ordinance 25-03 could still be introduced at a future meeting, but as of publication date, it will not be introduced February 13th and hence cannot be considered at the subsequent February 27th meeting.
The meeting is scheduled for February 13th at 6 p.m. in Council Chambers at Mandeville City Hall.
Executive Session: Sucette Harbor Lawsuits
The Mandeville City Council has scheduled an executive session under Louisiana Revised Statutes 42:16 and 42:17(A)(2) to discuss the ongoing federal lawsuit, Woodward Harbor, LLC v. City of Mandeville, case number 23-05824, currently before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Executive sessions are not open to the public.
This development follows U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long’s recent order for a settlement conference between the involved parties. The conference aims to facilitate discussions that could lead to a resolution, though it does not mandate a settlement. The lawsuit, filed in 2023, centers on disputes over zoning and property rights, with developers and city officials at odds.
The executive session will be held at the end of the February 13th meeting.
Introduction of ordinances:
Ordinance 25-05
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.
Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville. (Mandeville Daily)
Ordinance 25-06
(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)
Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.
The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.
Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.
A side-by-side comparison of the changes proposed by Ordinance 25-06 to city code. (Mandeville Daily)
Special Event Permits:
Approval of ‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Special Event Permit Application for “Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” approved for February 23, 2025, from 11:00am-7:00pm on Copal St. Street closure and barricade usage contingent upon Council and Police approval.
Approval of ‘Krewe of Eve Parade’ Preparations
(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)
Approval of the Viewing Stage for Milestone Project Services- “Krewe of Eve Parade” to be held February 21, 2025 from 4:00-10:00pm. Rain Date: N/A Location: 1265 West Causeway Approach Median (See Map) Approval Requests: Permission to set up stage in the median (50 people), Council approval of location. Contingent upon: Certificate of Insurance, Council approval of location, agree to remove stage after parade.
Unfinished Business:
Adoption of Ordinance 24-46
(District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz)
Ordinance 24-46 proposes authorizing the Mayor of Mandeville to execute the necessary documents to establish and purchase a drainage and access servitude on Lots 1 and 2 in the Lewisburg Subdivision for $307,403.00, as appraised by Murphy Appraisal Services. This servitude will support improvements to the Old Golden Shores drainage system, specifically the primary outfall channel running from Elm Street to Lake Pontchartrain, addressing drainage needs for the surrounding area. The transaction will include reasonable closing costs, and the property transfer must be free of encumbrances. The ordinance takes effect immediately upon the Mayor’s signature.
Adoption of Resolution 24-69
(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)
Resolution 24-69 authorizes the Mayor to execute a professional services agreement with Greenleaf Architects, APAC, for the City Hall renovations project. The agreement, signed on December 05, 2024, includes architectural design work for the New Council Chambers and other renovations.
New Business:
Approval of Change Order No. 3
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of Change Order No. 3 for the 2022 Roadway & Drainage Maintenance Contract adding new pay items X-018, no change in contract limit or time.
Approval of Change Order No. 5
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of change Order No. 5 for the 2022 Striping Maintenance Contract adding an additional speed radar sign foundation, with no change in maximum contract amount or time.
Approval of Change Order No. 2
(District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz)
Approval of Change Order No. 2 for the Golden Glen Water System Replacement Project adding an additional 70 days to the time with the completion date of April 11, 2025.
Approval of Change Order No. 4
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Approval of Change Order No. 4 for the 2022 Asphalt Maintenance Contract to add pay items 04-001-04-011, no change in the maximum contract time or amount.
Adoption of Resolution 25-02
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Resolution 25-02 would authorize the Mayor of the City of Mandeville to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Fairway Consulting+Engineering for upgrades to Lift Stations 13, 18, and 37. The amendment extends the agreement by one year, through November 9, 2025, to allow the consultant to continue construction administration services. The extension does not modify the scope of work, add additional fees, or change the maximum compensation under the original agreement. This resolution ensures continuity in the project’s administration without increasing costs.
Adoption of Resolution 25-03
(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)
Resolution 25-03 authorizes the Mayor to execute Amendment No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fairway Consulting and Engineering, LLC. The amendment extends the agreement for an additional year and includes additional scope of work and fees.
Does not mean judge is ‘ordering’ parties to settle
Talks could help judge assess merits if no agreement
Dismissal of both cases still on table
MANDEVILLE — A federal judge has ordered a “settlement conference” in the ongoing lawsuits between Woodward Harbor LLC and the LSU Health Foundation New Orleans, and the City of Mandeville and Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman.
The order doesn’t mean that U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long is actually “ordering” the parties to settle the cases. Instead, it suggests that they at least attempt discussions to assess the current state of affairs before he goes any further. It’s been 14 months since the lawsuits were filed and Long is not the original judge assigned to the case.
According to a minute entry filed on January 31st, Long held a status conference with attorneys representing both parties.
After the discussions, the court instructed counsel to contact U.S. Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier to schedule a settlement conference in February.
The lawsuits, filed in 2023, have been a contentious issue in Mandeville, with developers and city officials at odds over zoning and property rights.
While the order does not take dismissals off the table, judges can require settlement conferences before hearing cases like these for numerous reasons which may include the following:
Reduces court backlog by freeing time for trials.
Saves judicial resources and time by avoiding lengthy hearings and evidence review.
Existing signs say parking already restricted on Lakeshore Drive
There are over 40 signs along the 1.5-mile stretch of Lakeshore Drive (not including speed limit, historical markers, and pet waste disposal signs), among which are at least a dozen no-parking signs that appear to contradict even the existing law at Section 10-70, which only prohibits parking for more than six hours.
According to current signage on Lakeshore Drive, parking is either prohibited from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., 2 a.m. to 6 a.m., completely prohibited around the clock, or not prohibited at all. And these no-parking signs have been there for years, dating back from before any of the current council members or mayor.
Although it’s challenging to discern where one parking zone ends and another starts, the casual observer would have to conclude that some form of nighttime parking is already illegal on at least half to three-quarters of Lakeshore Drive.
A selection of the numerous no-parking signs along Lakeshore Drive. There are over 40 signs in all, covering other activities such as parking on the grass, littering, picnicking, etc. (Mandeville Daily)
Where did all the no-parking and other signs come from?
Mandeville Daily couldn’t find in the city code of ordinances where the Lakeshore Drive no-parking zones are codified. The only places that even come close are sections 10-70, 10-72, and 10-73 which prohibit parking longer than six hours, “sleeping overnight,” and parking in medians, respectively.
However, under Louisiana law, infractions related to parking signs can be cited. La. R.S. § 32:143(14) says that parking is prohibited “at any place where official signs prohibit such.” And we do seem to have plenty of signs along Lakeshore Drive that do indeed prohibit such.
This means that according to state law you already can be cited if you are parked across from “The Barley Oak” or “Donz on the Lake” starting at 2 a.m. And if you park your car to work out at 5:15 a.m., again, you could be cited. That’s what the signs say.
But the real question is, who had the signs along Lakeshore Drive erected in the first place?
LaGrange may have been referring to Section 10-64 “Regulations at Specific Locations” which says “the mayor and councilmen” as a body can “restrict” parking “from time to time” (as needed) at various locations.
‘NO DUMPING’ signs on West Beach Parkway were first spray-painted to just say ‘NO’ but now they have been repurposed to help find a lost cat. (Mandeville Daily)
Mandeville Daily asked Mr. Discon about the alleged confrontations and if he had ordered the signs erected to which we received the following reply, along with forwarded responses from City Attorney Elizabeth Sconzert and another lawyer from the Blue Williams Law Firm:
“Please see the attached and remember there is No Parking and /or Littering on Public thoroughfares in the City of Mandeville. Public Works put the signs out; I only suggested aa (sic) reduction in the number of signs and placement to work with the residents of both of Mandeville’s historic avenues,” Mr. Discon wrote in part.
The “attached” essentially provided a legal rationale from Blue Williams explaining why littering and dumping leaves are unlawful and that the city doesn’t need permits to install signs.
Death by a thousand cuts… or signs
Is this simply a situation where elected officials have ordered, requested, or “suggested” certain signs at various locations in order to address pet-peeve code violations, or perhaps to appease complaints from “Karen” constituents, and then the Public Works Department felt compelled to comply?
Some sources are telling Mandeville Daily that’s exactly what’s been going on in Mandeville for decades, from before the current City Council and mayor, and no one has really noticed the broader problem it has created — sign litter or sign creep — until now.
They say that Section 10-70 (no parking longer than six hours) originated in either 1979 or 1985, probably to keep residents of Lakeshore Drive at the time from using public parking spaces adjacent to or across from their homes as their own personal parking.
But how we transitioned from the initial six-hour prohibition to the dozen or so signs with varying parking periods remains a mystery. It was probably driven by the best intentions, but has resulted in a bunch of signs that don’t match what’s on the books, and on face value seem quite onerous.
And the fact remains: these signs are definitely enforceable, should officials choose to do so.
Creates more problems than it solves
Proposed Ordinance 25-03 would only cause more chaos and add new parties to the list of the offended, i.e. Woodrow and General Pershing streets.
What about the St. Tammany Parish School System buses that park on Woodrow Street?
The preamble of Ordinance 25-03 mentions a “hardship” faced by the Mandeville Police Department in enforcing the “in excess of six (6) hours” rule as one of the factors prompting the proposed modifications.
But the no-parking signs all along Lakeshore Drive already negate the six-hour rule, giving authorities the ability to write tickets for parked cars between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. today, right now, without this proposed ordinance.
Wouldn’t it create a far greater burden on the Mandeville Police Department to have to track which vehicles along Woodrow or General Pershing streets belong to residents of the local apartments and hence exempt as stated in Ordinance 25-03?
Wouldn’t the city have to issue parking permits to accomplish this?
I would find it hard to believe that it’s the Mandeville Police Department who is clamoring for this ordinance. If not, then who is? Who would stand to benefit?
Council needs to overhaul Old Mandeville signage strategy and process
Mandeville Daily 