Resolution outlines application period, public review meeting and separate vote
Proposal requires public disclosure of all applicants before nominations
MANDEVILLE — A proposal before the Mandeville City Council at the March 12 meeting would establish a formal, multi-stage process for appointing members to city boards and commissions, an effort intended to standardize how the council reviews applicants and conducts nominations.
Resolution 26-08, sponsored by District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson, seeks to replace the council’s current mix of informal practices with a structured procedure designed to ensure that all applicants receive full consideration and that the public has advance notice of candidates being considered. 
The measure also applies to commissioners seeking reappointment, requiring them to go through the same application and nomination process as new candidates.
Proposed multi-stage appointment process
Under the resolution, the council would begin each appointment cycle by announcing at a public meeting that applications are being accepted for a specific board or commission vacancy.
Within 48 hours of that announcement, the council clerk would be required to post the request for resumes on the city’s website and on the front door of City Hall, as well as publish the notice in the city’s official journal. 
Applicants would then have a minimum of 14 business days to submit resumes. Those resumes must include information such as how long the applicant has lived in Mandeville, career history, relevant experience and a statement explaining why they are seeking appointment.
The resumes would be treated as public records, with only personal telephone numbers redacted. 
Work session before any vote
Once the application period closes, the resolution requires the council to hold a dedicated work session to review all applicants.
After the application period closes, the council clerk would publish the names of all applicants on the agenda for the next council meeting where the review session will occur. The resumes of those applicants would also be included in the publicly available meeting materials, with limited redactions for personal information.
In past appointment processes, the names of applicants were not always publicly disclosed in advance of council deliberations. In several instances, Mandeville Daily obtained the identities of applicants only after submitting public records requests to the city seeking resumes or other materials submitted for board and commission vacancies.
Louisiana’s Public Records Law “requires that the name, related qualifications, relevant employment history or experience of each applicant for a public position of authority or a public position with policymaking duties shall be available for public inspection, examination, copying, or reproduction…”
Applicants themselves would also be allowed to address the council during the discussion phase if they wish.
The resolution then requires a second meeting — the next regularly scheduled council meeting — for nominations and voting.
Majority vote with elimination rounds
During the action meeting, council members would nominate candidates from the applicant pool. Each council member could nominate only one person for an open seat.
If multiple candidates are nominated, the council clerk would conduct a roll-call vote. A candidate must receive a majority of the members present to be appointed.
If no candidate receives a majority on the first vote, the nominee with the fewest votes would be eliminated and additional rounds of voting would continue until a majority winner is reached. 
The proposal also seeks to eliminate what it describes as a “first to nominate” bias, in which the first candidate placed into nomination can effectively limit consideration of other applicants.
Addressing past appointment disputes
Strong-Thompson’s proposal appears aimed at addressing recurring disputes over how the council handles nominations to boards and commissions.
Over the years, the council has relied on a variety of informal practices when filling seats, sometimes leading to confusion about the nomination process and whether all potential candidates were being fully considered.
Those questions surfaced during several past appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. In 2021, council members debated whether two open seats on the commission could be filled during the same meeting after nominations were made from the floor.
Similar issues arose in 2023 when the council began considering candidates to fill a vacant Planning and Zoning seat. The nomination process unfolded over multiple meetings as council members debated potential candidates before ultimately confirming an appointee.
The new resolution seeks to formalize that process by requiring a defined application period, a public review session to discuss the full pool of applicants and a separate meeting for nominations and voting.
Supporters say the approach would ensure that all applicants are publicly identified in advance and that council members have time to review their qualifications before taking action.
If adopted, Resolution 26-08 would supersede previous resolutions and informal methods used by the council when filling seats on boards and commissions.
Related Stories:
– Field of 9 applicants vie for 2 P&Z vacancies
– P&Z applicant résumés available for inspection
– Cressy appointed to P&Z, confirmation vote set for Aug. 24th
– Council could fill both P&Z vacancies tonight, not just one
– City Council scheduled to vote on unnamed P&Z nominee
-30-
Mandeville Daily 