Queer Northshore social media posts signal shift from original stated theme on application

Change to honor legacy of 1969 Stonewall Riots

Route includes Lakeshore Drive, Girod Street with ‘block party’ at Mandeville Trailhead

Trailhead events to include ‘drag performances’ on main stage

MANDEVILLE — Organizers of Queer Northshore’s “Pride Northshore Parade” have taken to social media to signal a shift from the original, council-approved “Celebration of Pride Month” theme to “Protesting with Pride.”

A Queer Northshore Instagram post explains the change in theme as follows:

“This year, as LGBTQ+ rights face relentless attacks from those in power, our theme — ‘Protesting with PRIDE’ — honors the bold legacy of the 1969 Stonewall Riots, which sparked the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement.”

The Stonewall Riots, which started on June 28, 1969, in New York City, marked a violent episode in the LGBTQ+ movement. A police raid on a popular gay bar sparked clashes that lasted for several days.

During the riots, at least 13 people were arrested and multiple injuries were reported as tensions flared between demonstrators and police. Protesters hurled bottles, bricks, and debris, leading to bloody clashes with police in the streets.

Additionally, Mandeville Daily was contacted by locals who said they were concerned about materials they discovered on the Queer Northshore’s official website, including a graphic describing a “colors of resistance” procession of ten flags during the parade, among them an upside-down U.S. flag and a Palestinian flag.

“Regarding concerns about the inclusion of certain flags in this year’s Pride parade — specifically the Palestinian, Mexican, and upside-down American flags, we feel it is important to explain our values clearly,” the graphic reads.

A message on another page of the website reads: “Pride is not neutral. It is not ‘just a celebration.’ It is a platform for resistance, solidarity, and truth-telling — even when that truth is uncomfortable.”

One version of the graphic on the website was later changed to show a Ukrainian flag instead of the upside-down American flag, however, as of today (June 3rd), the original version with the upside-down American flag could still be found on the website.

Last year, Pro-Palestinian supporters with their banners, flags and symbols (watermelon logos and keffiyehs) marched in the parade through the predominantly Conservative Historic Old Mandeville neighborhood. According to surveys, most Conservatives are staunchly pro-Israel when it comes to the Israel-Palestinian debate.

Posts on multiple Instagram accounts — @northshore4palestine, @queernorthshore, @qtcapnola and @louisianaalliesforpalestine — promoted last year’s parade as a pro-Palestinian event or boasted of their participation in the parade afterwards.

The special events permit for 2025 was approved, 3-1, by the City Council on February 27th. Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, an ethnic Jew who recently converted to Catholicism, was the only council member who voted against it. District III Councilwoman Jill Lane was absent.

The parade is scheduled to roll down Lakeshore Drive and up Girod Street, culminating in a block party at the Mandeville Trailhead Saturday, from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m.

The Mandeville Police Department posted a reminder on Facebook that parking will not be permitted anywhere along the parade route and they plan to strictly enforce the rule:

---

Related:

• ‘Pride Northshore’ parade permit approved 3-1
• FLASH: ‘Pride’ supporters confront councilman over ‘no’ vote in parking lot after meeting, give chase in car
• OPINION | Council needs to answer ugly behavior after Pride-vote meeting

---

-30-

Case on life-support as all claims dismissed except equal-protection challenge

MANDEVILLE — In a sweeping ruling that significantly narrows the legal battle over the proposed Sucette Harbor development, a federal judge has dismissed nearly all claims brought against the City of Mandeville by Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans.

However, the court has allowed one claim — alleging unequal treatment under the law — to proceed.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long comes just days after the court dismissed all claims against Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, citing qualified immunity.

In this latest decision, the judge found that the developers failed to establish that the city violated their constitutional rights by rejecting a proposed zoning change and development plan for the controversial lakefront project.

The plaintiffs argued that the city’s unanimous 5-0 vote against the proposed 82-room hotel, apartments, restaurant, and marina constituted an unconstitutional “regulatory taking” under both federal and state law. However, the court found these claims legally insufficient.

Judge Long ruled that the plaintiffs lacked a “recognized species of property right” under Louisiana law to compel the City Council’s approval of their project. Federally, he found that the developers failed to demonstrate that the denial of the project deprived them of all economically beneficial use of the property, a crucial requirement under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Lucas decision.

---

Related:

• Sucette Harbor killed, 5-0
• Sucette sues City of Mandeville, council member
• City, Zuckerman file motions to dismiss Sucette lawsuit
• Federal judge orders ‘settlement conference’ in Sucette Harbor lawsuits
• Residents, conservationists seek to join Sucette Harbor legal dispute, file motion to intervene
• VINDICATED: Judge tosses case against Zuckerman in Sucette Harbor lawsuit

---

The court also rejected the developers’ claims based on the Penn Central balancing test, noting that they failed to provide concrete evidence of substantial economic loss, unreasonable interference with investment-backed expectations, or any overreach by the city’s decision-making process.

The judge further emphasized that the plaintiffs’ complaints about disorganized public meetings, inconsistent application of rules, and opposition from council members amounted to “conclusory allegations” that lacked sufficient evidence to support a due process violation.

Equal Protection Claim Survives

Despite dismissing most of the case, Judge Long allowed one claim to proceed: an allegation that the city treated the Sucette Harbor project differently from other marinas in Mandeville. The developers argue that they faced stricter conditions and penalties not applied to similar developments, which could potentially violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Under Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, a U.S. Supreme Court case adopted by the Fifth Circuit, such “class-of-one” claims can proceed when plaintiffs allege intentional, arbitrary discrimination.

Judge Long concluded that the plaintiffs’ factual allegations on this point were sufficient, at least at the motion-to-dismiss stage, to warrant further examination through discovery and litigation.

Implications for the Plaintiffs

This ruling is a devastating blow for the plaintiffs, who have now lost nearly all their legal arguments. Their remaining path in federal court hinges on proving that the city engaged in discriminatory treatment by imposing unfair restrictions on the Sucette Harbor project.

The judge’s opinion also reaffirms the broad discretion of local governments in land-use decisions, particularly when those decisions are made through established legislative processes.

The surviving equal protection claim could still pose challenges for the city, especially if it is found to have applied zoning rules inconsistently. However, the overall momentum of the case has shifted decisively in favor of the city.

Download the court’s ruling here.

-30-

Zuckerman shielded by qualified immunity — all claims dismissed ‘with prejudice’

Says Zuckerman is immune from developer’s claims under federal and state law

Seen as major setback for plaintiffs in pending suit against city

MANDEVILLE — In a major development in the high-profile Sucette Harbor lawsuit, a federal judge has dismissed all claims against Mandeville City Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, citing qualified immunity. The ruling significantly narrows the scope of the ongoing legal battle over the proposed waterfront development along Lake Pontchartrain.

Zuckerman was dismissed “with prejudice” because the court found he was immune and the plaintiffs didn’t have enough legal grounds to sue him — even with potential amendments. It means the case is permanently closed and cannot be refiled in the future.

The decision, issued today, March 27th, by U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long, grants Zuckerman’s motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs — Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans — failed to plead sufficient facts to overcome his immunity from liability under both federal and Louisiana law.

Zuckerman Protected by Qualified Immunity

The court ruled that Zuckerman was acting within his rights as an elected official when he voted against the development and participated in related public deliberations. Although the plaintiffs accused him of improperly influencing the decision and acting with personal bias, the judge concluded that none of Zuckerman’s alleged actions violated “clearly established” law.

“Qualified immunity protects all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law,” the ruling states, adding that the plaintiffs failed to cite any binding legal precedent indicating Zuckerman’s conduct was unlawful. As a result, the court determined that Zuckerman is shielded from liability.

Judge Long noted that the plaintiffs did not provide a single example from Supreme Court or Fifth Circuit case law that would have put Zuckerman on notice that his alleged behavior—ranging from seeking outside input to criticizing the project’s design—violated any constitutional rights.

Implications for the Broader Case

Zuckerman had been a central figure in the lawsuit, which accuses the City of Mandeville and its council of unlawfully rejecting the proposed Sucette Harbor development. The project, proposed by Woodward Harbor on land owned by LSU Health Foundation, included an 82-room hotel, age-restricted apartments, a marina, and a restaurant. The City Council unanimously rejected the plan in September 2023 after nine public hearings.

The dismissal of claims against Zuckerman — one of the project’s most vocal critics — represents a legal setback for the plaintiffs. They had alleged that he improperly influenced the process, misused procedural rules, and imposed arbitrary conditions to block the project. But the judge ruled that those allegations did not rise to the level of a constitutional or legal violation.

Additionally, the court declined to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint against Zuckerman, citing a lack of any indication that new facts would change the legal outcome.

City Still Faces Legal Challenge

While the claims against Zuckerman have been dismissed, the broader lawsuit against the City of Mandeville continues. The plaintiffs are pursuing multiple claims under the U.S. and Louisiana constitutions, including allegations of regulatory takings, due process violations, and unequal treatment under the law.

The dismissal of Zuckerman may be seen as a precursor to how the court views similar allegations against the city itself, particularly regarding legislative immunity and procedural fairness.

This ruling follows a series of recent legal moves, including a motion to dismiss filed by a group of residents and conservationists who have also sought to intervene in the case. That motion argues that the developers lack any protected property interest in the zoning decision and that no taking occurred under state or federal law.

As the legal dispute presses on, the outcome of this case may have far-reaching consequences not only for the future of the Sucette Harbor property but also for the interpretation of land use powers in municipalities across Louisiana.

Download the court’s order to dismiss Zuckerman here.

-30-

Also, council to consider doubling number of short-term rental permits

MANDEVILLE — A representative from the St. Tammany Parish Library Board of Control will address the Mandeville City Council at its March 13th regular meeting, urging citizens to support the renewal of a 15-year, 4.35-mill property tax to fund the parish’s public library system.

The tax, set for a March 29th ballot vote, is stated to provide funding for library facilities, furnishings, equipment, and operations.

The library system has faced controversy in recent years over allegedly offensive materials in children’s sections purportedly relating to what critics call the LGBTQ+ agenda.

This led to a major shake-up on May 4, when the Parish Council replaced five of six board members.

The upcoming presentation aims to make the case for continued funding amid these ongoing debates.

Other March 13th Agenda Items

Complete details of proposed resolutions, ordinances, work orders, task orders, and special event permits can be found in the official agenda packet for the March 13th City Council meeting.

Introduction of ordinances:

Ordinance 25-07 (one-way OLL school traffic)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

The City of Mandeville is proposing an amendment to Section 10-38(b) of the Mandeville Code of Ordinances to establish temporary one-way traffic on a section of Jefferson Street during school carline hours. The ordinance would place a “Do Not Enter” sign on Jefferson Street between Carroll Street and Lafitte Street during 7:00-8:00 AM and 1:30-2:30 PM on school days, allowing traffic to flow only eastward. This change is being implemented to help reduce congestion and improve traffic flow near Our Lady of the Lake School.

If passed, the ordinance will authorize the Mandeville Police Department to install and maintain the necessary signage to enforce the temporary one-way designation. All other existing traffic regulations in Section 10-38(b) will remain unchanged. The amendment will take effect upon the Mayor’s signature, ensuring that the city can manage school-related traffic more efficiently while enhancing public safety.

Presentations:

St. Tammany Library Millage Renewal

The St. Tammany Parish public library system is seeking a dedicated property tax renewal on the March 29th, 2025, ballot. The parish proposes a 15-year, 4.35 mill tax to fund public library facilities, furnishings, equipment, and operations.

Children’s Museum of St. Tammany

Shelly Winstead presenting.

Special Event Permits:

‘Girod Street Stroll’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Old Mandeville Business Association- “Girod Street Stroll” event to be held April 12, 2025 from 5:00-9:00 p.m. Rain Date: April 19, 2025. Location: Girod St.(see map) Approval Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit contingent upon ATC permit, Certificate of Insurance, and coordination with MPD for barricades, signs, and cones.

‘City of Mandeville National Day of Prayer’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event Permit Application for the City of Mandeville- “National Day of Prayer” to be held on May 1, 2025 from 12:00-1:00 p.m. Rain Date: N/A Location: Mandeville Lakefront (between Lafitte and Carroll Street) Approval Requests: Lift ordinance of food/ drinks on the lakefront and approve tent and chair setup.

Unfinished Business:

(none)

New Business:

Approval of Liquor License (Aperitif restaurant)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of Liquor License – Aperitif Spritz and Bites Restaurant located at 1943 Lakeshore Drive, Mandeville.

Approval of Change Order (asphalt and re-striping)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of Change Order No. 5 for the 2022 Asphalt Maintenance Contract to add permanent and temporary pavement marking and legends items needed to re-stripe roadway segments. No change in maximum contract amount or time needed.

Approval of Task Order (drainage maintenance)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of the 2022 Roadway and Drainage Maintenance Task Order No. 9 Substantial Completion Certificate.

Adoption of Ordinance 25-02 (short-term rentals increase)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

The City of Mandeville is proposing amendments to its Comprehensive Land Use Regulations Ordinance (CLURO) regarding short-term rentals (STRs), specifically Whole House Rentals. The ordinance aims to update permit fees, liability insurance requirements, and the cap on rental permits.

Key changes include:

• Increased Permit Fees: The initial application fee for a Whole House Rental will be raised to $1,000, and the renewal fee to $500.
• Higher Insurance Requirements: Owners of short-term rental properties must now carry liability insurance of at least $1,000,000, up from the previous $500,000 requirement.
• Expansion of Permit Cap: The total number of Whole House Rental permits allowed in the city will be increased from 10 to 20.

These changes are intended to enhance public safety, ensure compliance with local regulations, and accommodate growing demand for short-term rentals while continuing to monitor their impact on the community. All other existing provisions related to short-term rentals will remain unchanged.

Adoption of Ordinance 25-04 (ban motorized transport on sidewalks)

(District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson)

The City of Mandeville is proposing Ordinance No. 25-04, which would regulate the use of motorized conveyances on sidewalks to enhance public safety and pedestrian accessibility. Under this ordinance, individuals over the age of 10 would be prohibited from operating motorized vehicles—such as electric or gas-powered scooters—on sidewalks within the city. However, children 10 years old or younger would be allowed to use motorized conveyances under 5 mph, provided they do so safely. The ordinance also bans motorized conveyances on sidewalks in business and commercial districts, unless permitted by signage.

Certain exceptions are outlined, including mobility devices for individuals with disabilities, law enforcement officers on duty, and city workers performing maintenance. The ordinance establishes penalties for violations, with a warning for the first offense and fines up to $50 for repeat violations. If passed, the ordinance will go into effect upon the Mayor’s signature.

Adoption of Resolution 25-05 (LDEQ compliance notification)

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

The City of Mandeville is notifying the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) about actions taken to comply with municipal water pollution prevention and wastewater discharge permit requirements under the Louisiana Water Discharge Permit System (LPDES). The resolution confirms that the City Council has reviewed an environmental audit report and outlines ongoing and future measures to ensure regulatory compliance and improve wastewater management.

Key actions include training certified operators, conducting inflow and infiltration (I&I) testing, monitoring wetland discharges, maintaining rock-reed filtration efficiency, and ensuring proper aeration and biological treatment. The city also plans to upgrade lift stations, prevent collection system overflows, enhance environmental monitoring, and explore alternative disinfection methods for wastewater discharge. These steps aim to maintain permit compliance, improve water treatment efficiency, and protect the local environment.

Adoption of Resolution 25-06 (wetlands restoration project)

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

The City of Mandeville is authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to its Professional Services Agreement with Neel-Schaffer, Inc. for the Mandeville Lakefront Wetlands Restoration Project. The amendment reflects additional work requested by the city, including adding a rip rap cap, updating geotechnical and hydraulic reports, adjusting berm elevations, revising permitting documents, and incorporating the Galvez Diversion Channel excavation and marsh creation as a bid alternate.

To accommodate these changes, the consultant’s professional service fees will increase by $18,281, and the contract’s expiration date will be extended by one year to April 14, 2026. The amendment ensures the necessary survey, design, and bidding services are completed for the wetlands restoration efforts.

Adoption of Resolution 25-07 (endorse parish sales tax renewal)

(Councilmen at large Scott Discon and Jason Zuckerman)

The City of Mandeville is expressing its support for the renewal and partial rededication of the existing 2% sales tax in Sales Tax District No. 3 of St. Tammany Parish, which will be put to a public vote on March 29, 2025. This tax, originally levied in 1986 and last renewed in 2006, has been used exclusively for road, street, bridge, and drainage improvements within the district.

The proposed renewal will not introduce new taxes but will rededicate a portion of the proceeds to help fund essential law enforcement-related entities in the parish. The City Council supports the measure as necessary for public safety, warning that if it fails, St. Tammany Parish may struggle to meet its mandated funding obligations, potentially leading to staff reductions and operational cuts in law enforcement, which could jeopardize community safety.

-30-

Residents and environmental group argue plaintiffs have no protected property rights

MANDEVILLE — The legal battle over the controversial Sucette Harbor development continues to escalate, as a group of local residents and environmental advocates who recently sought to intervene in the case have now filed a motion to dismiss several claims made by the developers.

The motion, filed by Intervenors Lawrence Grundmann, Kathleen Grundmann, Emory Clark, Thomas Snedeker, Robert Ellis, Emily Ellis, Walter Bahn, Mary Bahn, Ellen O’Connell, James K. O’Connell, Tom Whalen, Teri Whalen, Ralph Whalen, Christopher G. Brantley, Ph.D., and the Orleans Audubon Society, argues that Woodward Harbor LLC and LSU Health Foundation New Orleans have failed to establish a valid legal claim under both state and federal law. The Intervenors contend that because the Mandeville City Council has full discretion over zoning changes, the plaintiffs cannot claim they had a protected property interest in the approval of their development proposal.

Challenging Key Claims in the Case

The Intervenors’ filing specifically seeks to dismiss Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of the plaintiffs’ lawsuit, which include takings claims under the Louisiana Constitution, federal due process claims, and claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion asserts that:

• The developers do not have a constitutionally protected property right in obtaining zoning changes or conditional use permits.
• Louisiana law does not recognize a “right to develop” property unless a permit has already been granted, which is not the case here.
• Regulatory takings claims require total deprivation of economic value, but the plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the property has been rendered completely useless.
• Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are baseless, as the rejection of a zoning request by an elected city council does not violate due process rights.

Citing a recent federal court ruling in Plaquemines Parish Ventures, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Council, the Intervenors argue that zoning decisions by elected bodies are considered legislative actions, meaning procedural due process claims do not apply.

Next Steps in the Legal Battle

The motion to dismiss comes after the failure of court-ordered settlement talks between the developers, the City of Mandeville, and Councilman Jason Zuckerman. With no agreement reached, and the Intervenors now actively challenging key claims, the case is poised to proceed through federal litigation.

Legal analysts suggest that if the court grants the motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs’ case could be significantly weakened, possibly forcing them to refocus their arguments on remaining claims, such as equal protection.

Meanwhile, environmental advocates see this as a crucial step in preventing what they argue is an ecologically harmful and legally dubious development in the Sucette Harbor area. A ruling on the motion is expected in the coming weeks.

-30-

Several ‘Queer Northshore’ proponents waited by Zuckerman’s vehicle

Police officer escorted Zuckerman to vehicle

Zuckerman, witness reported ‘Pride’ supporters followed him in car from City Hall to lakefront

MANDEVILLE — A gaggle of ‘Queer Northshore’ supporters attempted to confront Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman in the City Hall parking lot near his vehicle, immediately after Thursday’s City Council meeting where he was the sole ‘no’ vote against the ‘Pride Northshore Parade’ special event permit, which passed 3-1.

The same group — after seemingly being dispersed by a police officer who had to escort Zuckerman to his vehicle when witnesses reported a group lying in wait for him — hopped into their own vehicle and followed him for several miles to the lakefront, where Zuckerman made a series of turns to finally to lose the tail, according to Zuckerman.

Another witness captured the license plate number of the pursuing vehicle which has been turned over to Mandeville Police.

Mandeville Police Chief Todd Schliem issued the following statement in response to a Mandeville Daily query:

“Our public servants are fulfilling a sacred civic duty to serve our wonderful community. No one should ever be subjected to threats or intimidation, especially a public official over a disagreement with a public policy position.”

It is unclear what effect this incident could have on the standing of the ‘Pride Northshore Parade’ permit approved earlier in the meeting.

This is a developing story.

-30-

Zuckerman voted against, Lane was absent

City Council meeting results: February 27th, 2025

MANDEVILLE — The City Council voted 3-1 to approve a special event permit for the “Pride Northshore” parade down Lakeshore Drive scheduled for June 7th.

Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman voted against the permit. District III Councilwoman Jill Lane (formerly McGuire) was absent.

Queer Northshore was asking the City Council to approve its “Pride Northsore” parade special events permit tonight so that the group can parade down Lakeshore Drive for the second year in a row.

The application requests the closure of Lakeshore Drive in Old Mandeville starting at Jackson Avenue and ending at the Mandeville Trailhead on Girod Street on Saturday, June 7th, from 4 to 9 p.m.

The group paraded last year on June 1st.

The results for the remainder of the City Council’s agenda for the February 27th, 2025, regular meeting are provided here.

Special Event Permits:

‘Mandeville Live’: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for City of Mandeville — “Mandeville Live” to be held Fridays (March 21, 2025 – May 9, 2025) 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Location: Mandeville Trailhead. Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol permit Contingency: ATC permit.

‘Mandeville Family Reunion’: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Susan Brady- “Mandeville Family Reunion” to be held May 25, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Mandeville Lakefront- stage near Lafayette Street. Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.

‘Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk’: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Sherrard Crespo — “Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk” to be held on April 12, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. – 11:30 p.m. Location: Lakefront Harbor to Gazebo Walk Path Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.

‘Mandeville Food Truck Festival’: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Mandeville Lion’s Club — “Mandeville Food Truck Festival” to be held on May 10, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Private Property (Mandeville Lion’s Club) Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol Permit. Contingency: ATC permit.

‘Queer Northshore: Pride Northshore Parade’: Approved 3-1 (Zuckerman against)

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application and Parade Route Approval for Queer Northshore — “Pride Northshore Parade” to be held on June 7, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Location: Lakeshore Boat Launch to Trailhead (see map) Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit and parade route approval. Contingency: ATC permit and parade route approval.

‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’ date change: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

“Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” Event was approved on 2-13-25 and requires approval for a date change to 3-2-25 from 12:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m. Location: Copal St (Between Cindy Lou and Live Oak). Approval Requests: Date change to 3-2-25 .

Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. The original version of the agenda did not include the above item.

New Business:

Approval of Liquor License: Approved 4-0

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the liquor license for “Iceburg Charlie’s” (sic).

Adoption of Ordinance 25-01: Approved 4-0

Ordinance 25-01 amends the City of Mandeville’s Operating Budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year to allocate additional funding for social services. This adjustment, outlined in Budget Amendment No. 6 (Social Services) and detailed in the attached Exhibit “A,” is necessary due to expenditures exceeding the originally approved budget. The amendment follows the financial procedures set by the city’s Home Rule Charter. All other provisions of the original budget ordinance (Ordinance No. 24-22) will remain unchanged.

REMOVED: Adoption of Ordinance 25-05

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. This item has been removed from the latest version of the agenda.

Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.

Adoption of Ordinance 25-06: Approved 4-0

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.

The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.

Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.

Adoption of Resolution 25-04: Approved 4-0

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Resolution 25-04 authorizes the Mayor of Mandeville to execute Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement between the city and Waggonner & Ball, Inc. The original agreement, established on May 15, 2023, covered various design and engineering services for the Police Department Building Design project. Since the estimated construction cost has increased from $4 million to $7.207 million, the consultant’s fee must be recalculated accordingly. The resolution ensures that the revised agreement reflects the updated cost estimate while maintaining the original scope of professional services.

-30-

City Council meeting preview: February 27th, 2025

Queer Northshore is asking the City Council to approve it’s “Pride Northsore” parade special events permit tonight so that the group can parade down Lakeshore Drive for the second year in a row.

The application requests the closure of Lakeshore Drive in Old Mandeville starting at Jackson Avenue and ending at or near Coffee Street on Saturday, June 7th, from 4 to 9 p.m.

The group paraded last year on June 1st.

In other business, the remainder of the City Council’s agenda for the February 27th, 2025, regular meeting is provided here.

The meeting is scheduled for 6 p.m. in Council Chambers at Mandeville City Hall.

Introduction of ordinances:

Ordinance 25-04

(District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson)

Ordinance 25-04 would regulate the use of motorized conveyances on sidewalks within the City of Mandeville to enhance public safety and pedestrian accessibility. The ordinance defines motorized conveyances as any vehicle propelled by electric, gas, or battery power, excluding mobility devices for individuals with disabilities. Recognizing potential hazards posed by these vehicles, the city aims to balance the needs of different modes of transportation while prioritizing pedestrian safety.

Under the proposed ordinance, individuals over the age of ten are prohibited from operating motorized conveyances on sidewalks. Children aged ten and younger may use such devices under 5 mph, provided they do so safely without endangering or obstructing pedestrians. Additionally, motorized conveyances are strictly prohibited in business and commercial districts unless specifically allowed by signage. Exceptions are made for mobility devices, law enforcement officers performing official duties, and city workers or contractors who need access for maintenance or construction purposes.

Violations of the ordinance would result in a warning for the first offense, while subsequent violations may lead to a fine of up to $50 per occurrence. The ordinance includes a severability clause, ensuring that if any part of it is deemed invalid, the remaining provisions will still be enforceable.

Special Event Permits:

‘Mandeville Live’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for City of Mandeville — “Mandeville Live” to be held Fridays (March 21, 2025 – May 9, 2025) 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Location: Mandeville Trailhead. Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol permit Contingency: ATC permit.

‘Mandeville Family Reunion’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Susan Brady- “Mandeville Family Reunion” to be held May 25, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Mandeville Lakefront- stage near Lafayette Street. Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.

‘Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event Permit and Request to Lift Ban on Food and Drinks on Lakefront for Sherrard Crespo — “Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Walk” to be held on April 12, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. – 11:30 p.m. Location: Lakefront Harbor to Gazebo Walk Path Request: Lift ordinance of food and drinks on lakefront. Contingency: Approval of food and drinks on lakefront.

‘Mandeville Food Truck Festival’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application for Mandeville Lion’s Club- “Mandeville Food Truck Festival” to be held on May 10, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Private Property (Mandeville Lion’s Club) Request: Approval to apply for ATC Alcohol Permit. Contingency: ATC permit.

‘Queer Northshore: Pride Northshore Parade’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Special Event and Alcohol Permit Application and Parade Route Approval for Queer Northshore — “Pride Northshore Parade” to be held on June 7, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Location: Lakeshore Boat Launch to Trailhead (see map) Request: Approval to apply for ATC alcohol permit and parade route approval. Contingency: ATC permit and parade route approval.

‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’ date change

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

“Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” Event was approved on 2-13-25 and requires approval for a date change to 3-2-25 from 12:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m. Location: Copal St (Between Cindy Lou and Live Oak). Approval Requests: Date change to 3-2-25 .

Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. The original version of the agenda did not include the above item.

New Business:

Approval of Liquor License

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the liquor license for “Iceburg Charlie’s” (sic).

Adoption of Ordinance 25-01

Ordinance 25-01 amends the City of Mandeville’s Operating Budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year to allocate additional funding for social services. This adjustment, outlined in Budget Amendment No. 6 (Social Services) and detailed in the attached Exhibit “A,” is necessary due to expenditures exceeding the originally approved budget. The amendment follows the financial procedures set by the city’s Home Rule Charter. All other provisions of the original budget ordinance (Ordinance No. 24-22) will remain unchanged.

REMOVED: Adoption of Ordinance 25-05

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Editor’s Note: The published agenda for the February 27th meeting was revised since it was first published last Thursday. This item has been removed from the latest version of the agenda.

Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.

Adoption of Ordinance 25-06

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.

The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.

Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.

Adoption of Resolution 25-04

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Resolution 25-04 authorizes the Mayor of Mandeville to execute Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement between the city and Waggonner & Ball, Inc. The original agreement, established on May 15, 2023, covered various design and engineering services for the Police Department Building Design project. Since the estimated construction cost has increased from $4 million to $7.207 million, the consultant’s fee must be recalculated accordingly. The resolution ensures that the revised agreement reflects the updated cost estimate while maintaining the original scope of professional services.

-30-

Legal battle over controversial development continues as residents seek to join the case

City Council to meet in executive session to discuss

MANDEVILLE — A federal court-ordered settlement conference in the ongoing Sucette Harbor lawsuit failed to produce a resolution, leaving the case to proceed through litigation.

The conference, held on February 24th before U.S. Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier in the Eastern District of Louisiana, brought together representatives from the key parties, including Woodward Harbor LLC, LSU Health Foundation New Orleans, the City of Mandeville, and individual litigant Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman. However, after over two hours of discussions, no settlement was reached.

The lawsuit, originally filed under Civil Action No. 23-5824, stems from a legal dispute over the proposed Sucette Harbor development rejected by the City Council in 2023. Woodward Harbor LLC and its partners have been at odds with the City of Mandeville over land use, zoning, and environmental concerns, while LSU Health Foundation New Orleans and Zuckerman have also entered the legal battle with separate interests.

In a related development, a coalition of local residents and environmental advocates filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit on February 21st. This group seeks to have their voices heard in the legal proceedings, expressing concerns about the potential environmental impact of the proposed development on the Sucette Harbor area. Their involvement could introduce new perspectives and potentially complicate the litigation further.

---

Related:

• Sucette Harbor killed, 5-0
• Sucette sues City of Mandeville, council member
• City, Zuckerman file motions to dismiss Sucette lawsuit
• Federal judge orders ‘settlement conference’ in Sucette Harbor lawsuits
• Residents, conservationists seek to join Sucette Harbor legal dispute, file motion to intervene

---

Despite the failure to reach an agreement, the court has left the door open for further discussions. Judge Dossier advised that counsel for the parties may seek further assistance from the court if needed.

The City Council scheduled a special meeting for tonight at 6 p.m. to discuss the matter in an executive session, which in accordance with state law will be closed to the public.

With the impasse at the settlement table, the case is expected to move forward in federal court, where further legal proceedings will determine the future of the contested development.

-30-

Residents, conservationists move to join lawsuit over Mandeville hotel, events center, apartments, marina project

Wildlife advocates say Sucette Harbor plan threatens Lake Pontchartrain ecosystem

Intervenors argue city land use rules must be enforced to stop overdevelopment

Seek expedited hearing to head off settlement conference scheduled for Monday

MANDEVILLE — A coalition of local residents and environmental advocates filed a “motion to intervene” Friday in the ongoing federal lawsuit involving the City Council’s vote to deny the Sucette Harbor project in 2023.

The long-debated, often-criticized Sucette Harbor project was rejected September 5th, 2023, after a months-long process that generated a groundswell of opposition to building a hotel, events center, and apartment complex in the middle of a residential area at the west end of the Mandeville Lakefront.

The intervenors — a group of homeowners, a biologist, and the Orleans Audubon Society — petitioned the court to allow them to participate in the case, citing their personal, environmental, and property-related interests.

The proposed intervenors include Lawrence Grundmann, Kathleen Grundmann, Emory Clark, Thomas Snedeker, Robert Ellis, Emily Ellis, Walter Bahn, Mary Bahn, Ellen A. O’Connell, James K. O’Connell, Tom Whalen, Teri Whalen, Ralph Whalen, Dr. Christopher G. Brantley, and the Orleans Audubon Society.

Their motion argues that the Sucette Harbor project will have severe environmental consequences, increase traffic congestion, and negatively impact property values in the area. They further claim that previous marina projects in the same location have led, or would have led, to disastrous results for Mandeville and its residents.

The Orleans Audubon Society and Dr. Christopher Brantley, a professional biologist, are particularly concerned with the project’s impact on wildlife habitats, including critical areas for migratory birds and native species. Their motion states that the project will destroy old-growth trees, disrupt wetland ecosystems, and contribute to increased erosion along the Lake Pontchartrain shoreline.

---

Related:

• Sucette Harbor killed, 5-0
• Sucette sues City of Mandeville, council member
• City, Zuckerman file motions to dismiss Sucette lawsuit

---

Additionally, the intervenors contend that the City of Mandeville’s Comprehensive Land Use Regulations Ordinance (CLURO) is not being properly followed, and that they have a distinct legal interpretation of these regulations that differs from both the plaintiffs and the defendants.

The Sucette Complaint, originally filed on October 5th, 2023 by Woodward Harbor LLC and the LSU Health Foundation New Orleans, alleges that the city improperly restricted development on the plaintiff’s land, violating property rights under the Takings Clause and other legal doctrines.

The city and co-defendant Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman have responded with multiple motions to dismiss, arguing that the case lacks merit or is not yet ripe for judicial review.

The proposed intervenors now seek to join the case as defendants, aligning with the city’s opposition to the project, but from an environmental and residential protection perspective rather than an economic or regulatory one.

The intervenors have also requested an expedited hearing and oral arguments, urging the court to consider their position before any settlement discussions or rulings take place.

The settlement conference is scheduled for Monday, February 24th.

If granted, their intervention would expand the scope of the litigation to include broader environmental and community-based concerns. If denied, they may need to pursue separate legal action or advocacy efforts to prevent the development from moving forward.

The court has yet to schedule a hearing on the motion, but with multiple dismissal motions, settlement discussions, and now an intervention request pending, the case is rapidly evolving. Legal analysts suggest that this new development could significantly influence the trajectory of the lawsuit and its potential outcomes for Mandeville residents, conservationists, and developers alike.

This remains a developing story, and further updates will follow as the court considers the intervention request and other pending motions.

-30-

Sometimes nine lives just aren’t enough

MANDEVILLE — A cherished community cat named Boots, known for his friendly nature and iconic white “boots” on all four feet, was found dead this morning on the street near “The Bean” coffee shop. It appears that Boots was struck by a vehicle in the pre-dawn hours on Girod Street.

For years, Boots had been a familiar and welcome presence at The Bean, where he was allowed to come and go as he pleased. Many patrons brought him food and treats while enjoying their Saturday morning coffee, and he never hesitated to share their company.

Boots’ passing is a heartbreaking loss for the neighborhood, as he had become a beloved fixture in the community. His gentle and affectionate nature made him a favorite among customers and staff alike.

“He was part of the experience here,” said one regular. “Saturday mornings won’t be the same without him.”

Another cat, a gray Maine Coon mix who preferred to remain anonymous, was discovered standing guard over the body in the dark, apparently mourning the loss. The gray Maine Coon is not believed to be connected to the death of Boots.

---

See Also:

Residents, conservationists seek to join Sucette Harbor legal dispute, file motion to intervene

---

Though Boots is gone, his memory will live on in the hearts of those who knew him. Community members are already sharing fond memories of him, and some have suggested putting up a small memorial near The Bean in his honor.

Boots will be deeply missed.

-30-

Mandeville implements new parking restrictions for Krewe of Eve parade amid safety concerns

MANDEVILLE — In response to recent safety concerns, the City of Mandeville has announced new security measures for the 2025 Krewe of Eve Mardi Gras Parade, scheduled to roll on Friday, February 21st.

According to a press release from the Mandeville Police Department, parking will no longer be allowed along the parade route roadsides, medians or shoulders this year. Officials say this decision is aimed at enhancing public safety and reducing potential risks for both spectators and parade participants.

“We understand this change might be inconvenient for some, as parking along the parade route has been a long-standing tradition,” the statement reads. “However, considering current circumstances, we believe this precaution is necessary to minimize potential risks.”

The move follows the New Year’s Day terror attack in New Orleans, as cities across Louisiana reassess their security measures for large public gatherings, especially during Mardi Gras season, which attracts thousands of revelers.

Paradegoers are encouraged to plan ahead for parking alternatives and to follow all city guidelines to ensure a safe and enjoyable event. Law enforcement officials also urge the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity.

For updates and additional information, residents can visit the City of Mandeville’s official website or follow the Mandeville Police Department’s Facebook page.

Statement from the Mandeville Police Department (February 11th):

Considering recent events and our continuous commitment to prioritize public safety, the City of Mandeville is implementing new security measures for the upcoming Krewe of Eve Parade, scheduled for February 21, 2025.

Parking will not be allowed on the parade route or the opposite side of the streets along the parade route this year. This measure is intended to help mitigate threats to the safety and security of all attendees and participants.

We understand this change might be inconvenient for some, as parking along the parade route has been a long-standing tradition. However, considering current circumstances, we believe this precaution is necessary to minimize potential risks.

We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in helping us work towards a safer and more enjoyable parade for everyone.

-30-

Ordinance 25-03 not carried over from canceled Jan. 23 meeting

Executive session called to discuss Sucette Harbor lawsuits

---

Editor’s Note: The Councilwoman from District III notified the City Council that she legally changed her name from “Jill McGuire” to “Jill Lane.” Mandeville Daily will refer to her accordingly moving forward.

---

MANDEVILLE — A controversial parking ordinance will not be introduced at the February 13th City Council meeting as had been expected after the cancellation of the January 23rd meeting where it was slated for introduction on the published agenda.

Ordinance 25-03, sponsored by Councilman at Large Scott Discon, would shake up parking rules on Lakeshore Drive and at the Mandeville Trailhead, ending the practices of overnight school-bus parking on Woodrow Street and a local auto-repair business allegedly parking customer vehicles on General Pershing Street. The proposal, according to critics, would also add confusion to lakefront parking.

The Discon ordinance — which created a stir on social media — was the only voting item not to be carrying over from the January 23rd meeting after it was canceled due to snow.

Ordinance 25-03 could still be introduced at a future meeting, but as of publication date, it will not be introduced February 13th and hence cannot be considered at the subsequent February 27th meeting.

---

Related:

• Proposed ordinance would shake up parking on Lakeshore Drive, Trailhead area
• OPINION | Proposed parking ordinance highlights lakefront’s confusing and cluttered signage crisis

---

The February 13th agenda as of Mandeville Daily publication time can be downloaded here. The agenda packet (hosted on the city’s website) can be downloaded here.

The meeting is scheduled for February 13th at 6 p.m. in Council Chambers at Mandeville City Hall.

Executive Session: Sucette Harbor Lawsuits

The Mandeville City Council has scheduled an executive session under Louisiana Revised Statutes 42:16 and 42:17(A)(2) to discuss the ongoing federal lawsuit, Woodward Harbor, LLC v. City of Mandeville, case number 23-05824, currently before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Executive sessions are not open to the public.

This development follows U.S. District Judge Brandon S. Long’s recent order for a settlement conference between the involved parties. The conference aims to facilitate discussions that could lead to a resolution, though it does not mandate a settlement. The lawsuit, filed in 2023, centers on disputes over zoning and property rights, with developers and city officials at odds.

The executive session will be held at the end of the February 13th meeting.

Introduction of ordinances:

Ordinance 25-05

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.

Ordinance 25-06

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.

The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.

Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.

Special Event Permits:

Approval of ‘Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party’

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Special Event Permit Application for “Old Golden Gras Neighborhood Party” approved for February 23, 2025, from 11:00am-7:00pm on Copal St. Street closure and barricade usage contingent upon Council and Police approval.

Approval of ‘Krewe of Eve Parade’ Preparations

(District III Councilwoman Jill Lane)

Approval of the Viewing Stage for Milestone Project Services- “Krewe of Eve Parade” to be held February 21, 2025 from 4:00-10:00pm. Rain Date: N/A Location: 1265 West Causeway Approach Median (See Map) Approval Requests: Permission to set up stage in the median (50 people), Council approval of location. Contingent upon: Certificate of Insurance, Council approval of location, agree to remove stage after parade.

Unfinished Business:

Adoption of Ordinance 24-46

(District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz)

Ordinance 24-46 proposes authorizing the Mayor of Mandeville to execute the necessary documents to establish and purchase a drainage and access servitude on Lots 1 and 2 in the Lewisburg Subdivision for $307,403.00, as appraised by Murphy Appraisal Services. This servitude will support improvements to the Old Golden Shores drainage system, specifically the primary outfall channel running from Elm Street to Lake Pontchartrain, addressing drainage needs for the surrounding area. The transaction will include reasonable closing costs, and the property transfer must be free of encumbrances. The ordinance takes effect immediately upon the Mayor’s signature.

Adoption of Resolution 24-69

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Resolution 24-69 authorizes the Mayor to execute a professional services agreement with Greenleaf Architects, APAC, for the City Hall renovations project. The agreement, signed on December 05, 2024, includes architectural design work for the New Council Chambers and other renovations.

New Business:

Approval of Change Order No. 3

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of Change Order No. 3 for the 2022 Roadway & Drainage Maintenance Contract adding new pay items X-018, no change in contract limit or time.

Approval of Change Order No. 5

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of change Order No. 5 for the 2022 Striping Maintenance Contract adding an additional speed radar sign foundation, with no change in maximum contract amount or time.

Approval of Change Order No. 2

(District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz)

Approval of Change Order No. 2 for the Golden Glen Water System Replacement Project adding an additional 70 days to the time with the completion date of April 11, 2025.

Approval of Change Order No. 4

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of Change Order No. 4 for the 2022 Asphalt Maintenance Contract to add pay items 04-001-04-011, no change in the maximum contract time or amount.

Adoption of Resolution 25-02

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Resolution 25-02 would authorize the Mayor of the City of Mandeville to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Fairway Consulting+Engineering for upgrades to Lift Stations 13, 18, and 37. The amendment extends the agreement by one year, through November 9, 2025, to allow the consultant to continue construction administration services. The extension does not modify the scope of work, add additional fees, or change the maximum compensation under the original agreement. This resolution ensures continuity in the project’s administration without increasing costs.

Adoption of Resolution 25-03

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Resolution 25-03 authorizes the Mayor to execute Amendment No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fairway Consulting and Engineering, LLC. The amendment extends the agreement for an additional year and includes additional scope of work and fees.

-30-

Seen as act of defiance against sign clutter on historic streets

Mayor said he didn’t order signs erected

Update: As of Friday, January 31st, all of the recently erected no-dumping signs on West Beach Parkway have been removed by order of Mayor Clay Madden.

MANDEVILLE — Someone has taken matters into their own hands on West Beach Parkway by spray-painting two of the recently erected “NO DUMPING” signs to read simply “NO” in an apparent act of defiance.

It remains unclear who at the City of Mandeville ordered no-dumping and no-parking signs erected along Marigny Avenue and West Beach Parkway in late 2024.

In December, Mayor Clay Madden told Mandeville Daily that he didn’t order the signs on either street.

Madden directed the removal of the signs from the historic Marigny Avenue median after residents reported confrontations with city officials, including Councilman at Large Scott Discon, regarding activities like blowing leaves onto the median.

Multiple sources had told Mandeville Daily that Discon himself had requested the signs to be erected on both historic streets.

However, in response to a Mandeville Daily request for comment in December as to who ordered the signs erected, Discon responded only that parking and littering on public thoroughfares are illegal and that the Public Works Department “put the signs out.”

But Public Works Director Keith LaGrange had previously indicated during council meetings that City Council approval via ordinance is required to erect no-parking signs.

Discon recently sponsored proposed Ordinance 25-03 which would overhaul parking regulations along Lakeshore Drive and other areas near the Mandeville Trailhead.

Ordinance 25-03 is expected to be taken up by the City Council in February.

-30-

Outlaws lakefront parking before 6AM — even for workouts

Would prohibit parking ‘between’ 2AM and 6AM in listed areas

Adds Trailhead streets, parking lot to ‘prohibited’ list

Could end overnight school-bus parking on Woodrow Street

Comes on heels of Marigny Avenue parking and dumping signs kerfuffle

Updated to include reporting on existing no-parking signage along Lakeshore Drive. (1/24/2025)

MANDEVILLE — Predawn parking along the lakefront, including for those who briefly leave their vehicles while they walk or jog, could soon become illegal — before 6 a.m. that is — if a proposed ordinance becomes law.

Councilman at Large Scott Discon has proposed Ordinance 25-03 which would outlaw parking, regardless of how brief, between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. along Lakeshore Drive, General Pershing Street, Woodrow Street, and a city-owned parking lot near the Mandeville Trailhead.

The far western end of Woodrow Street is where St. Tammany Parish School System buses are often seen parked overnight, a practice that would presumably become illegal with this ordinance.

The typical morning routine on Lakeshore Drive begins around 5 a.m. when a cluster of cars, SUVs, and pickup trucks are parked along the street. Their owners, usually in the dark, embark on their morning exercise routines, particularly during the summer months, to avoid the heat.

---

Related: OPINION | Proposed parking ordinance highlights lakefront’s confusing and cluttered signage crisis

---

Local bars and taverns, such as “Donz on the Lake” and “The Barley Oak,” close at 2 a.m. on weekends, which means patrons parking on Lakeshore Drive would need to move their vehicles by closing time else risk being cited, should Ordinance 25-03 become law.

Muddying the waters is the fact that there are already no-parking signs scattered along Lakeshore Drive with wording to prohibit parking between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. or 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. Ordinance 25-03 does not address these existing no-parking signs or where the prohibited parking starts and stops, nor could Mandeville Daily find where or when they were established in city code.

Ordinance 25-03 would alter Section 10-70, of the City of Mandeville’s Code or Ordinances which prohibits “permanent parking” along the lakefront.

Section 10-70, titled “Permanent parking prohibited; definition; penalty for violation,” currently defines “permanent parking” as “parking in excess of six(6) hours.” The fines are set forth under Appendix C of the code of ordinances.

Ordinance 25-03 would change that definition to read, “‘Permanent Parking’ shall be defined as parking between the hours of 2:00am-6:00am. (sic)”

This means that under a stricti juris interpretation, Ordinance 25-03’s redefinition of “permanent parking” would consider any vehicle parked even for a short period between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. in violation of city code.

Discon’s proposal would also add to the prohibited areas Woodrow Street from Girod to Carroll streets (except for certain local residents), General Pershing Street from Girod to Carroll streets (except for certain local residents), which lie on the north and south sides of the Mandeville Trailhead, and the city-owned parking lot at the Trailhead.

The preamble of Ordinance 25-03 mentions a “hardship” faced by the Mandeville Police Department in enforcing the “in excess of six (6) hours” rule as one of the factors prompting the proposed modifications:

“WHEREAS, recognizing that the current time limitation on parking in the above-described areas imposes a hardship on the City of Mandeville Police’s record keeping efforts of ‘permanent parking’;”

In December, Mayor Clay Madden directed the removal of recently installed “NO PARKING” and “NO DUMPING” signs from the historic Marigny Avenue median, as he had not authorized their installation. Residents reported confrontations with city officials, including Discon, regarding activities like blowing leaves onto the median. In response to a Mandeville Daily request for comment as to who ordered the signs erected, Discon responded that parking and littering on public thoroughfares are illegal and that the Public Works Department had installed the signs. However, Public Works Director Keith LaGrange previously indicated that City Council approval via ordinance is required to erect no-parking signs.

Ordinance 25-03 was slated for “introduction” at the January 23rd City Council meeting, but that meeting was canceled due to the aftermath of the snowstorm that hit the deep south January 21st.

Assuming the January 23rd agenda is moved to the February 13th regular meeting, the earliest Ordinance 25-03 could come up for discussion and a vote would be at the February 27th regular meeting. Ordinances are neither discussed nor debated when introduced.

-30-

MANDEVILLE — The City Council’s primary agenda items with descriptions for the January 23rd, 2025, regular meeting are provided here. This is based on the revised published agenda, which was updated Sunday, January 19th.

The meeting is scheduled for January 23rd, 2025, at 6 p.m. in Council Chambers at Mandeville City Hall.

Introduction of ordinances:

Ordinance 25-03

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Ordinance 25-03 would amend Section 10-70 of Mandeville’s Code of Ordinances, redefining “permanent parking” as parking between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., instead of the previous six-hour rule, to ease police enforcement, meaning even brief parking would become prohibited in the outlined streets and areas. The ordinance would expand prohibited parking areas to include both sides of Woodrow Street from Girod to Carroll Streets (with exceptions for certain residents), General Pershing Street from Girod to Carroll Streets (with exceptions for apartment residents), and the city-owned Trailhead parking lot. These changes aim to promote orderly use of public spaces, accommodate community needs, and optimize police resources. Violators will face penalties under Section 1-9 of the Code of Ordinances.

Ordinance 25-05

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Ordinance 25-05 proposes the annexation of approximately 2.89 acres of land, encompassing portions of Lots 3 and 4 in Square 117, into the corporate limits of the City of Mandeville, which is the north side of Florida Street between Foy Street and Clausel Street. The annexed property will be designated as B-2 (Highway Business District) for zoning purposes, promoting commercial development, generating additional tax revenue, and creating employment opportunities. The ordinance also specifies revenue-sharing terms with St. Tammany Parish, allocating 80% of sales tax revenue to the City and 20% to the Parish, in accordance with prior agreements. The annexed property will fall within Council District 3, and the City’s zoning map will be updated to reflect these changes. The ordinance includes provisions ensuring its enforceability, even if specific sections are deemed invalid by a court.

Ordinance 25-06

(Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman)

Ordinance 25-06 proposes changes to “Sec. 2-6 – Indemnity” introducing several modifications to clarify and expand the scope of indemnification and exclusions for city employees, officers, and officials. While the original text allowed the City to select defense counsel and required officials to pay for their own counsel if they chose independent representation, the proposed changes permit officials to select their own defense counsel, subject to city council approval, which cannot be unreasonably withheld. This adjustment provides greater autonomy to those seeking legal representation while maintaining oversight to ensure responsible decision-making.

The proposed changes also expand the exclusions to indemnification. The original text excluded coverage for actions unrelated to legitimate governmental objectives, criminal or malicious behavior, and acts performed outside the course of employment. The proposed changes refine these provisions by explicitly stating that acts outside the “course and scope” of employment are excluded and by adding two new exclusions: lawsuits initiated by or at the request of the City (e.g., disciplinary proceedings) and punitive damages awards. These additions aim to safeguard city resources while ensuring that only legitimate claims related to public service are covered.

Finally, the proposed changes enhance clarity by separating reimbursement obligations into a new section. Both versions require officials found liable for excluded acts to reimburse the City for defense costs, but the proposed changes explicitly state that the City may recover attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing reimbursement obligations. These revisions emphasize clarity, accountability, and precision, ensuring the ordinance balances protections for public servants with the responsible use of city resources.

Special Event Permits:

Approval of ‘Krewe of Eve Parade’ Preparations

(District III Councilwoman Jill McGuire)

Approval of the Viewing Stage for Milestone Project Services- “Krewe of Eve Parade” to be held February 21, 2025 from 4:00-10:00pm. Rain Date: N/A Location: 1265 West Causeway Approach Median (See Map) Approval Requests: Permission to set up stage in the median (50 people), Council approval of location. Contingent upon: Certificate of Insurance, Council approval of location, agree to remove stage after parade.

Unfinished Business:

Adoption of Ordinance 24-46

(District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz)

Ordinance 24-46 proposes authorizing the Mayor of Mandeville to execute the necessary documents to establish and purchase a drainage and access servitude on Lots 1 and 2 in the Lewisburg Subdivision for $307,403.00, as appraised by Murphy Appraisal Services. This servitude will support improvements to the Old Golden Shores drainage system, specifically the primary outfall channel running from Elm Street to Lake Pontchartrain, addressing drainage needs for the surrounding area. The transaction will include reasonable closing costs, and the property transfer must be free of encumbrances. The ordinance takes effect immediately upon the Mayor’s signature.

New Business:

Approval of Change Order No. 3

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Approval of Change Order No. 3 for the 2022 Roadway & Drainage Maintenance Contract adding new pay items X-018, no change in contract limit or time.

Adoption of Resolution 25-02

(Councilman at Large Scott Discon)

Resolution 25-02 would authorize the Mayor of the City of Mandeville to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Fairway Consulting+Engineering for upgrades to Lift Stations 13, 18, and 37. The amendment extends the agreement by one year, through November 9, 2025, to allow the consultant to continue construction administration services. The extension does not modify the scope of work, add additional fees, or change the maximum compensation under the original agreement. This resolution ensures continuity in the project’s administration without increasing costs.

-30-

January 9th, 2025, regular meeting of the Mandeville City Council

MANDEVILLE — Here are the results for each agenda item for the January 9th, 2025, regular meeting of the Mandeville City Council.

Members in attendance were: Councilman at Large (Council Chairman) Scott Discon, Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman, District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong Thompson, District II Councilman Kevin Vogeltanz, and District III Councilwoman Jill McGuire.

Below are the links to the exact start and end locations for each agenda item in the official council video of the meeting, along with the duration of each item.

Approval of Special Event Permit (JuJu’s Journey): Approved 5-0

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-37 (budget adjustment to allow for parks matching funds from state): Adopted 5-0

44:28 – 1:18:47 (34:19)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-40 (water and sewerage rates adjustment): Adopted 5-0

1:19:19 – 1:33:19 (14:00)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Re-appointment of Shawn Potter to Parks and Parkways Commission: Confirmed 5-0

1:34:37 – 1:35:43 (1:06)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Re-appointment of Karen McInness and Bill Barry to Historic Preservation District Commission: Confirmed 5-0

1:35:51 – 1:38:09 (2:18)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Re-appointment of Vaughan Sollberger and Leah Quinn to Historic Preservation District Commission: Confirmed 5-0

1:38:27 – 1:40:53 (2:26)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Approval of the Substantial Completion Certificate – Fontainebleau State Park Force Main: Approved 5-0

1:41:13 – 1:42:38 (1:25)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Resolution 25-01 (procedures for selecting city-funded charities): Adopted 5-0

1:42:48 – 1:51:46 (8:58)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-41 (Highway 22 drainage project increase budget adjustment): Adopted 5-0

1:51:56 – 1:57:50 (5:54)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-44 (flooded streets driving fines): Adopted 4-1

1:58:04 – 2:11:11 (13:07)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: N
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-45 (public records request fees for police-related records): Adopted 5-0

2:11:56 – 2:21:58 (10:02)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Adoption of Ordinance 24-46 (Lewisburg lot purchase for drainage): Postponed to January 23, 2025, meeting 5-0

2:21:58 – 2:24:07 (2:09)

(voice)
Zuckerman: Y
McGuire: Y
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

Affirm Historic Commission 24-12-35, 24-12-36 & 24-12-37 Decisions: Affirmed 3-0 (Appeal denied) (Zuckerman and McGuire recused/abstained)

2:25:37 – 4:22:01 (1:56:24)

(roll call)
Zuckerman: A
McGuire: A
Strong-Thompson: Y
Vogeltanz: Y
Discon: Y

-30-

‘Mandeville’ mentioned as crime scene in connection with New Orleans terror attack is actually Mandeville Street on South Shore

MANDEVILLE — The “Mandeville” mentioned this morning (January 2nd) as a crime scene in connection with the terror attack in New Orleans is actually “Mandeville Street” on the South Shore, not the City of Mandeville.

North Shore residents had to do a double-take this morning when watching a televised joint news conference of the FBI, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, and other officials.

FBI Deputy Assistant Director Christopher Raia mentioned a crime scene in “Mandeville” which triggered speculation that there was a local connection to the terror attack.

“We also have a scene of a Mandeville address, where we are currently searching that scene right now,” Raia said at the nationally televised news conference.

However, Mandeville Police Chief Todd Schliem told Mandeville Daily that Raia was referring to Mandeville Street in the St. Roch area of New Orleans.

Schliem said he had already received a call from the CNN television network concerning the matter.

-30-

Residents report warning from council member, police over leaves, parking in median

Signs appeared in recent weeks before confrontation with council member

Mayor never received request for signs to be erected, ordered them removed

MANDEVILLE — A series of recently installed “NO PARKING” and “NO DUMPING” signs have been removed from the historic Marigny Avenue median, at the direction of Mayor Clay Madden.

Some residents claim they were video-recorded and confronted by officials from the city recently, which included Councilman at Large Scott Discon, over leaves being blown onto the Marigny Avenue median in front of their homes.

Madden said he never received a request to install the signs, and he was therefore directing the Public Works Department to remove them as soon as possible.

The installation of the signs was not sanctioned by the City Council via ordinance either.

Mandeville Daily inquired with Discon about the Marigny Avenue signage and the alleged confrontation with residents. However, Discon clarified that it’s illegal to park and litter on Mandeville streets. He also mentioned that the Public Works Department installed the signs, and he had requested a reduction or consolidation of the signage after they were installed. His statement made no mention of a confrontation with homeowners nor who ordered the signs in the first place.

“Please see the attached (statements from the city legal department) and remember there is no parking and/or littering on public thoroughfares in the City of Mandeville. Public Works put the signs out; I only suggested a reduction in the number of signs and placement to work with the residents of both of Mandeville’s historic avenues,” Discon said in a statement to Mandeville Daily.

But according to previous on-the-record comments by Public Works Director Keith LaGrange in 2021 and 2023, City Council approval via ordinance is required to erect no-parking signs.

Section 9-2 of the code or ordinances does prohibit dumping of various types, including leaves, but there is no provision for posting “NO DUMPING” or “NO PARKING” signs.

Parking addressed by council in 2021 and 2023

In 2021, the City Council may have unwittingly outlawed parking on all medians throughout the city when it adopted Ordinance 21-30, which reads in part “parking on any median strip, within the city limits of the City of Mandeville … is prohibited.”

Ordinance 21-30 created Section 10-73 in the Code of Ordinances, defining medians as “the strip of land between lanes of opposing traffic on a divided highway.”

According to the discussion held during the October 28th, 2021, (1:37:20) City Council meeting, the purpose of Ordinance 21-30 was to specifically address parking problems at only two locations: Weldon Park and Golden Glen.

But there was no provision in the ordinance to erect no-parking signs, despite the sponsor, former District II Councilman Dr. Skelly Kreller, mentioning at the meeting that he had forgotten to include them and wanted them erected.

In fact, just before the vote on that ordinance, LaGrange informed the council that if they intended to install no-parking signs, the council would need to adopt that measure as well (1:38:33), presumably as an amendment before final adoption.

“Just for housekeeping purposes … If there’s ever gonna be a need to put a sign in the median, now would be the time to pass that, because no signs can be installed without your approval,” LaGrange told the council at the meeting.

However, Madden responded to the suggestion with concern that the residents of those two areas, based on conversations he had with them, would likely oppose the signage.

Ordinance 21-30 was adopted unanimously, without a provision for erecting no-parking signs.

In Discon’s statement to Mandeville Daily, he forwarded an additional statement from attorney Stephanie Hough of the Blue Williams Law Firm, who presumably acts as an assistant to City Attorney Elizabeth Sconzert.

According to the forwarded emails, Hough had been asked to research the matter by Sconzert. Her finding was that the aforementioned Ordinance 21-30 or Section 10-73 made it illegal to park in medians.

The last attempt by the council to order permanent no-parking signs in Old Mandeville was on Claiborne Street with Ordinance 23-28, which failed unanimously.

At that July 27th, 2023, City Council meeting, LaGrange said “all ‘no parking’ has to be done and set by ordinance.” (18:09)

LaGrange also said, “We allow parking on the sides of streets,” which would seem to contradict Discon’s statement that “there is no parking and/or littering on public thoroughfares.”

Officials confronted residents over leaves

A Marigny Avenue resident who requested to remain anonymous informed Mandeville Daily that the commotion appears to be primarily centered around the “no dumping” rule, as residents have consistently taken it upon themselves to create mulch around the trees in the median, as well as other minor landscaping improvements in front of their homes.

During heavy rains and hurricanes, flood waters frequently carry significant debris onto the median and their yards, according to local residents. Historically, they and their neighbors have taken it upon themselves to clean up these areas, they said.

The homeowner said she was video-recorded by a public works department employee recently as she was blowing leaves onto the median, and a short time later what she described as a Mandeville code enforcement official showed up to give her a warning.

She said Discon arrived about the same time and also warned her about doing work in the median. She said Discon told her the signs may be removed if the locals were to stop dumping and parking in the median.

However, the signs installed on Marigny Avenue were the permanent, official street signs, conforming to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

Another Marigny Avenue resident, who also requested anonymity, informed Mandeville Daily that a police officer visited their home to caution them against continuing to clean up the median. The resident expressed their surprise, stating that this issue has never been a concern in their four-plus-decades of home ownership on Marigny Avenue.

Signs detracted from historic street

Some say the signs ruined the character of one of the most historic streets in the city, which was named after Mandeville’s founder, Bernard Xavier Philippe de Marigny de Mandeville.

Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman said he didn’t believe the signs in the Marigny Avenue median were needed and ruined the aesthetic of what is supposed to be one of Mandeville’s most historic sites.

“Installing permanent signs such as ‘no parking’ and ‘no dumping’ — especially on the street named after our founder — is something that should have come before the council as a whole,” Zuckerman said.

The decades-old practice of parking in the median of Marigny Avenue has been heavily relied upon by attendees of local events like the “Light Up The Lake” Independence Day celebration, the “Mandeville Family Reunion,” the “Sunset Symphony,” and other regionally popular happenings.

Some estimates suggest that the median on Marigny Avenue can accommodate parking for about 200 vehicles. Consequently, a ban on parking there could affect Mandeville’s capacity to host large events on the lakefront.

Mandeville’s Code of Ordinances Section 10-64 authorizes city officials to temporarily restrict parking without ordinance “from time to time,” which is why locals see the now-familiar paper no-parking signs attached to wooden sticks during special events at the lakefront.

-30-

Potter vote failed 2-3

Rosenow appointed 5-0

MANDEVILLE — The City Council unanimously appointed Judge Pat Rosenow to a vacant seat on the Planning & Zoning Commission tonight (December 19th). This meeting was a stark contrast to the recent meetings where the matter of appointment was debated with rancor.

As anticipated, the nominating committee, comprising Councilman at Large Scott Discon and District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson, first nominated Shawn Potter. After a lengthy discussion and public comment, Potter’s appointment was rejected with a vote of 2-3, with only Discon and Strong-Thompson in favor.

In accordance with council rules, Strong-Thompson and Discon presented a second nomination, this time for Judge Pat Rosenow. Following a brief discussion, the council unanimously approved his appointment to the vacant seat.

Potter had been nominated by the committee at the October 24th council meeting, but at the November 21st meeting, the council opted to nullify that nomination at the urging of the city attorney due to an Open Meetings Law violation.

The nominating committee met December 5th to re-deliberate in public. No nominee was announced at the meeting, although City Attorney Elizabeth Sconzert indicated at the November 21st council meeting that she expected Potter to be nominated again.

The council had three applicants for the position: Ernest Burguières, a local attorney and former council member with regional planning expertise; Shawn Potter, Tulane University’s director of institutional research; and Judge Pat Rosenow, a chief administrative law judge with the U.S. Department of Labor.

The council chambers were predominantly filled with locals who had come to express their opinions on the matter. Twelve individuals spoke in favor of Rosenow, while a several advocated for Potter and Burguières.

-30-

Appointment would bring controversial process to an end

MANDEVILLE — The City Council is scheduled to fill a vacancy on the Planning & Zoning Commission at tonight’s meeting (December 19th), potentially bringing a lengthy process mired in controversy and challenges to an end.

Shawn Potter had been nominated by the committee at the October 24th council meeting, but at the November 21st meeting, the council opted to nullify that nomination at the urging of the city attorney due to an Open Meetings Law violation.

The nominating committee, made up of Councilman at Large Scott Discon and District I Councilwoman Cynthia Strong-Thompson, met December 5th to re-deliberate in public. No nominee was announced at the meeting, although City Attorney Elizabeth Sconzert indicated at the November 21st council meeting that she expected Potter to be nominated again.

The council has three applicants for the position: Ernest Burguières, a local attorney and former council member with regional planning expertise; Shawn Potter, Tulane University’s director of institutional research; and Judge Pat Rosenow, a chief administrative law judge with the U.S. Department of Labor.

Nominee not named on published meeting agenda

The agenda published by the City of Mandeville does not mention the nominee by name:

“Nomination and Appointment of Candidate to the Mandeville Planning and Zoning Commission.”

Under Louisiana’s Open Meetings Law (La. R.S. 42:19(A)(1)(b)(ii)(bb)) there is a requirement for “reasonable specificity” in agenda items for public meetings.

Councilman at Large Jason Zuckerman brought up the same issue at the October 24th meeting as the reason the council couldn’t vote on Potter that night — which they didn’t — presumably because “reasonable specificity” would have meant including the name of the person being appointed on the published agenda.

Ethics opinions requested without council consent

Sconzert contacted Rosenow’s Department of Labor superiors in early November to assess potential conflicts of interest for his role as an administrative law judge.

However, Sconzert did not inform the City Council that she was doing so nor did the council adopt a resolution to ask for the opinion, which is the normal process.

Sconzert’s request for the ethics opinion on Rosenow came after the October 24th council meeting where a majority of City Council members expressed opposition to Potter’s nomination.

Strong-Thompson also sought an ethics opinion on Rosenow in November from the Louisiana Attorney General’s office without the approval of the City Council.

Both officials noted that such opinions, which are non-binding, could take considerable time to obtain, leaving Rosenow’s candidacy in limbo, according to Discon.

“Two are qualified without any asterisk; we’ve got one with an asterisk,” Discon stated, referencing Rosenow’s pending ethics evaluations.

He suggested that Rosenow’s candidacy should be deferred until the questions surrounding his eligibility were resolved, emphasizing that “we appoint someone to the commission once a year, so in a matter of three years all three of these applicants could be on planning and zoning.”

After the December 5th meeting, a public records request by Mandeville Daily uncovered an email sent by Rosenow to Discon and other city officials less than an hour before the December 5th meeting began. In the email, Rosenow reported that that after discussions with the Department of Labor’s Office of Judges General Counsel and solicitor, he was advised that serving on the commission was not prohibited.

Sconzert and Discon both told Mandeville Daily they were not aware of Rosenow’s email, sent at 3:39 p.m., before or during the meeting, which started at 4:30 p.m.

---

Updated 12/19/2024: A typographical error in the last paragraph of this report has been updated to reflect that neither Mr. Discon nor Ms. Sconzert were aware of Judge Rosenow’s email before the December 5th meeting. Prior reporting by Mandeville Daily on December 12th correctly reported this information.

---

-30-