Council clears legislative agenda ahead of closed-door Sucette Harbor discussion

Previously scheduled salary study presentation remains as the only substantive public item before executive session

MANDEVILLE — With no new ordinances, unfinished business or new business scheduled, the Mandeville City Council’s April 23 agenda has been largely cleared of legislative matters — leaving a previously scheduled presentation and a closed-door Sucette Harbor discussion as the meeting’s primary focus.

The agenda contains no items under introduction of ordinances, unfinished business or new business, a departure from typical council meetings that often include multiple action items. 

The only substantive item remaining on the public agenda — a salary study presentation by consultant Codey Saucier — had been scheduled in advance and is unrelated to the ongoing litigation.

Council members are then scheduled to enter executive session under Louisiana law to discuss Woodward Harbor, LLC v. City of Mandeville, a federal case tied to the long-running Sucette Harbor dispute. 

Focus shifts behind closed doors

The pared-down agenda signals a shift from public-facing policymaking to legal strategy, as the city continues navigating the aftermath of the now-dismissed Sucette Harbor lawsuits and related proceedings.

In recent weeks, the legal battle has expanded beyond the original claims. As previously reported by Mandeville Daily, the LSU Health Foundation — which had sued the city and Councilman-at-Large Jason Zuckerman — has since filed suit against its former attorneys, alleging mishandling of their case.

That lawsuit followed a federal judge’s dismissal with prejudice of the original Sucette Harbor claims, as well as ongoing proceedings tied to potential sanctions and recovery of attorneys’ fees.

The City of Mandeville has sought to recover more than $230,000 in legal costs associated with defending the lawsuits.

Limited public discussion expected

Under Louisiana’s open meetings law, public bodies may enter executive session to discuss pending litigation. However, any formal action must still be taken in open session.

Because the discussion will occur behind closed doors, the public is unlikely to hear details of the council’s legal strategy or the options under consideration.

The streamlined agenda also means there will be little opportunity for broader policy debate during the meeting.

What remains on the agenda

Outside the executive session, the meeting includes:

  • Approval of minutes from the April 8 budget meeting and April 9 council meeting
  • A salary study presentation
  • A routine finance report

With no additional business scheduled, the meeting’s primary focus is expected to be the closed-door legal discussion.

Bigger picture

The Sucette Harbor litigation has evolved from a local development dispute into a broader legal saga involving dismissed claims, potential sanctions and a separate lawsuit between the original plaintiff and its former attorneys.

Thursday’s executive session marks the latest step as city officials weigh their next move — largely out of public view.

-30-


© 2026 Mandeville Daily. All rights reserved. Republishing permitted with attribution and link to the original article.

Leave a Reply